[news] Results from NetCAT 6.0 Community Acceptance survey

[Anuradha G]

http://qa.netbeans.org/processes/cat/60/results/ca_results.html
--
Anuradha G

[wmac]

Would you please make suggested features public too.

I am very interested to see what features people have requested. Perhaps
we can have another vote for most wanted features on netbeans web site.

I will appreciate if you can provide them again.

Mac


Anuradha G wrote:
>
> http://qa.netbeans.org/processes/cat/60/results/ca_results.html
> --
> Anuradha G

[Jiri Kovalsky]

Hello Siamak,

makes sense. It is available here:
http://qa.netbeans.org/processes/cat/60/results/features.html

Besides, top voted features are here:
http://qa.netbeans.org/bugzilla/dashboards/top-voted.html

Hope this helps,
-Jirka

Siamak Sarmady wrote:

> Would you please make suggested features public too.
>
> I am very interested to see what features people have requested. Perhaps
> we can have another vote for most wanted features on netbeans web site.
>
> I will appreciate if you can provide them again.
>
> Mac
>
>
> Anuradha G wrote:
>
>>
>> http://qa.netbeans.org/processes/cat/60/results/ca_results.html
>> --
>> Anuradha G

[Daniel Sheppard-4]

And I have now added a 10th vote for issue
http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46886.  In note hat this is
linked to "More complete Java EE freeform projects"
http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89477.

This linked issue includes the comment "Removing plan61 - only small UI
improvements are planned in the web freeform area".

Is this really true?  To my mind this is now the area where NetBeans is at its
weakest.  I know that it stops other Java developers in my company even
looking at NetBeans.  Surely it has to be on the roadmap somewhere?  Am I
right that free-form projects are the area that evangelists keep reporting as
a problem area?  I personally have many thoughts about how I would like it to
work that would make my MyEclipse-based colleagues re-think their IDE of
choice...

Daniel Sheppard

On Tuesday 27 November 2007 12:38:45 Jiri Kovalsky wrote:

> Hello Siamak,
>
> makes sense. It is available here:
> http://qa.netbeans.org/processes/cat/60/results/features.html
>
> Besides, top voted features are here:
> http://qa.netbeans.org/bugzilla/dashboards/top-voted.html
>
> Hope this helps,
> -Jirka
>
> Siamak Sarmady wrote:
> > Would you please make suggested features public too.
> >
> > I am very interested to see what features people have requested. Perhaps
> > we can have another vote for most wanted features on netbeans web site.
> >
> > I will appreciate if you can provide them again.
> >
> > Mac
> >
> > Anuradha G wrote:
> >> http://qa.netbeans.org/processes/cat/60/results/ca_results.html
> >> --
> >> Anuradha G

[Stanley Styszynski]

It's damn good to know that I'm not the only one who wants native Groovy Support :)

On Nov 27, 2007 2:19 PM, Daniel Sheppard <choc_dan@...> wrote:

And I have now added a 10th vote for issue
http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46886.  In note hat this is
linked to "More complete Java EE freeform projects"
http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89477.

This linked issue includes the comment "Removing plan61 - only small UI
improvements are planned in the web freeform area".

Is this really true?  To my mind this is now the area where NetBeans is at its
weakest.  I know that it stops other Java developers in my company even
looking at NetBeans.  Surely it has to be on the roadmap somewhere?  Am I
right that free-form projects are the area that evangelists keep reporting as
a problem area?  I personally have many thoughts about how I would like it to
work that would make my MyEclipse-based colleagues re-think their IDE of
choice...

Daniel Sheppard

On Tuesday 27 November 2007 12:38:45 Jiri Kovalsky wrote:

> Hello Siamak,
>
> makes sense. It is available here:
> http://qa.netbeans.org/processes/cat/60/results/features.html
>
> Besides, top voted features are here:
> http://qa.netbeans.org/bugzilla/dashboards/top-voted.html
>
> Hope this helps,
> -Jirka
>
> Siamak Sarmady wrote:
> > Would you please make suggested features public too.
> >
> > I am very interested to see what features people have requested. Perhaps
> > we can have another vote for most wanted features on netbeans web site.
> >
> > I will appreciate if you can provide them again.
> >
> > Mac
> >
> > Anuradha G wrote:
> >> http://qa.netbeans.org/processes/cat/60/results/ca_results.html
> >> --
> >> Anuradha G

[Luis Ramon Lopez]

It's curious that Android support was widely suggested. So, I'm not
alone on thinking it would be a nice feature.

Jiri Kovalsky wrote:

> Hello Siamak,
>
> makes sense. It is available here:
> http://qa.netbeans.org/processes/cat/60/results/features.html
>
> Besides, top voted features are here:
> http://qa.netbeans.org/bugzilla/dashboards/top-voted.html
>
> Hope this helps,
> -Jirka
>

[wmac]

Thank you very much. For sure helps  

Jiri Kovalsky wrote:

Hello Siamak,

makes sense. It is available here:
http://qa.netbeans.org/processes/cat/60/results/features.html

Besides, top voted features are here:
http://qa.netbeans.org/bugzilla/dashboards/top-voted.html

Hope this helps,
-Jirka