The attached patch fixes
-----------------------
extern int v14 __attribute__ ((visibility ("internal")));
int f1(void) {
return v14;
}
-----------------------
Right now we are not recording the visibility.
OK for lto if bootstraps and tests are OK?
2008-07-23 Rafael Espindola <
espindola@...>
* lto-tree-flags.def (VAR_DECL): add visibility_specified.
Cheers,
--
Rafael Avila de Espindola
Google Ireland Ltd.
Gordon House
Barrow Street
Dublin 4
Ireland
Registered in Dublin, Ireland
Registration Number: 368047
[vis.patch]
diff --git a/gcc/lto-tree-flags.def b/gcc/lto-tree-flags.def
index 779b888..21057ec 100644
--- a/gcc/lto-tree-flags.def
+++ b/gcc/lto-tree-flags.def
@@ -841,8 +841,8 @@
ADD_VIS_FLAG (weak_flag)
ADD_VIS_FLAG (seen_in_bind_expr)
ADD_VIS_FLAG (comdat_flag)
- /* ### Do we need visibility_specified ??? */
ADD_VIS_FLAG_SIZE (visibility, 2)
+ ADD_VIS_FLAG (visibility_specified)
/* ### We need to serialize the init priority itself. */
ADD_VIS_FLAG (init_priority_p)
ADD_VIS_FLAG_SIZE (tls_model, 3)
