[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12611601#action_12611601 ]
Kristian Waagan commented on DERBY-3763:
----------------------------------------
Thanks for the comment Dag.
I'll wait a while and see if anyone else has strong feelings about this.
If I go ahead with the current proposal, I'll change the comments/strings as you pointed out.
Since the current convention comes from the old test harness, I think it is acceptable to change it to something better in the new one. Others might think differently, if so please speak up.
BTW; If it had been "DerbyNet" and "DerbyClient" it would have been kind of okay, but it's "DerbyNet" and "DerbyNetClient" and that I find confusing.
> Rename BaseJDBCTestCase.usingDerbyNet
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-3763
> URL:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3763> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Test
> Affects Versions: 10.5.0.0
> Reporter: Kristian Waagan
> Assignee: Kristian Waagan
> Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: derby-3763-1a-usingDB2Client.diff, derby-3763-1a-usingDB2Client.stat
>
>
> The names of the methods 'usingDerbyNet' and 'usingDerbyNetClient' in BaseJDBCTestCase are confusing.
> I propose we change the one used to tell if we are using the DB2 client driver (JCC).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
