[jencks-user] XA enable Jencks/Spring

[Subramaniam, Parthiban]

Hello all,
Has any has got any examples of how to XA enable Jencks/Spring and
configure https://genericjmsra.dev.java.net/ in a binding mode

Appreciate your help,

Thanks,
Parthi

_______________________________________________________________________

This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations.
Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized.
If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately.

[James.Strachan]

On 23 Nov 2005, at 16:50, Subramaniam, Parthiban wrote:

> Hello all,
> Has any has got any examples of how to XA enable Jencks/Spring and
> configure https://genericjmsra.dev.java.net/ in a binding mode

There are heaps of examples in the unit test area of this in action...

http://cvs.jencks.codehaus.org/jencks/src/test/resources/org/jencks/

e.g. here's the genericjmsra example...
http://cvs.jencks.codehaus.org/jencks/src/test/resources/org/jencks/ 
spring-with-genericjmsra.xml?rev=1.4&view=auto

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/

[Subramaniam, Parthiban]

Hi James,
Forgive me for being thick,
i could not find any examples with regards to Websphere MQ most of them
were for ActiveMQ

is there anything regardsing Websphere MQ?

Appreciate your help

Best regards,
Parthi


-----Original Message-----
From: James Strachan [mailto:james.strachan@...]
Sent: 23 November 2005 16:56
To: user@...
Subject: Re: [jencks-user] XA enable Jencks/Spring


On 23 Nov 2005, at 16:50, Subramaniam, Parthiban wrote:

> Hello all,
> Has any has got any examples of how to XA enable Jencks/Spring and
> configure https://genericjmsra.dev.java.net/ in a binding mode

There are heaps of examples in the unit test area of this in action...

http://cvs.jencks.codehaus.org/jencks/src/test/resources/org/jencks/

e.g. here's the genericjmsra example...
http://cvs.jencks.codehaus.org/jencks/src/test/resources/org/jencks/ 
spring-with-genericjmsra.xml?rev=1.4&view=auto

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
_______________________________________________________________________

This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations.
Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized.
If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately.

[James.Strachan]

Use the GenericJMSRA...
> http://cvs.jencks.codehaus.org/jencks/src/test/resources/org/jencks/
> spring-with-genericjmsra.xml?rev=1.4&view=auto

and just change the JMS ConnectionFactory to instantiate the MQSeries  
connection factory instead.

The ConnectionFactory is a fairly simple POJO; unfortunately we don't  
have unit tests right now against every JMS provider (no can you  
easily unit test MQSeries in JUnit without a full MQ install :).

James

On 23 Nov 2005, at 18:14, Subramaniam, Parthiban wrote:

> Hi James,
> Forgive me for being thick,
> i could not find any examples with regards to Websphere MQ most of  
> them
> were for ActiveMQ
>
> is there anything regardsing Websphere MQ?
>
> Appreciate your help
>
> Best regards,
> Parthi
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Strachan [mailto:james.strachan@...]
> Sent: 23 November 2005 16:56
> To: user@...
> Subject: Re: [jencks-user] XA enable Jencks/Spring
>
>
> On 23 Nov 2005, at 16:50, Subramaniam, Parthiban wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>> Has any has got any examples of how to XA enable Jencks/Spring and
>> configure https://genericjmsra.dev.java.net/ in a binding mode
>
> There are heaps of examples in the unit test area of this in action...
>
> http://cvs.jencks.codehaus.org/jencks/src/test/resources/org/jencks/
>
> e.g. here's the genericjmsra example...
> http://cvs.jencks.codehaus.org/jencks/src/test/resources/org/jencks/
> spring-with-genericjmsra.xml?rev=1.4&view=auto
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
>
> This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender  
> does not waive any related rights and obligations.
> Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information  
> it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized.
> If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-
> mail or otherwise) immediately.

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/

[Raman Gupta]

James Strachan wrote:

> On 23 Nov 2005, at 18:14, Subramaniam, Parthiban wrote:
>
>> Hi James, Forgive me for being thick, i could not find any examples
>> with regards to Websphere MQ most of  them were for ActiveMQ
>>
>> is there anything regardsing Websphere MQ?
>>
> Use the GenericJMSRA...
>
> and just change the JMS ConnectionFactory to instantiate the MQSeries
> connection factory instead.

I can confirm this works.  Though, to be honest, I found the performance
of MQSeries via the genericra was pretty so-so and ended up using the MQ
base classes instead.  If you are creating a performance-sensitive app,
this may be of consideration for you.

However, if your performance results are better, then I'd be interested
in knowing about it -- something in my config may have been the problem.

Cheers,
Raman

[James.Strachan]

On 24 Nov 2005, at 06:05, Raman Gupta wrote:

> James Strachan wrote:
>> On 23 Nov 2005, at 18:14, Subramaniam, Parthiban wrote:
>>
>>> Hi James, Forgive me for being thick, i could not find any examples
>>> with regards to Websphere MQ most of  them were for ActiveMQ
>>>
>>> is there anything regardsing Websphere MQ?
>>>
>> Use the GenericJMSRA...
>>
>> and just change the JMS ConnectionFactory to instantiate the MQSeries
>> connection factory instead.
>
> I can confirm this works.  Though, to be honest, I found the  
> performance
> of MQSeries via the genericra was pretty so-so and ended up using  
> the MQ
> base classes instead.  If you are creating a performance-sensitive  
> app,
> this may be of consideration for you.

Ah - is there a Resource Adaptor for MQ from IBM? If so do you have  
the class names - then we can add it to the wiki to help other MQ users.

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/

[Raman Gupta]

James Strachan wrote:

>
> On 24 Nov 2005, at 06:05, Raman Gupta wrote:
>
>> James Strachan wrote:
>>
>>> On 23 Nov 2005, at 18:14, Subramaniam, Parthiban wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi James, Forgive me for being thick, i could not find any examples
>>>> with regards to Websphere MQ most of  them were for ActiveMQ
>>>>
>>>> is there anything regardsing Websphere MQ?
>>>>
>>> Use the GenericJMSRA...
>>>
>>> and just change the JMS ConnectionFactory to instantiate the MQSeries
>>> connection factory instead.
>>
>> I can confirm this works.  Though, to be honest, I found the  performance
>> of MQSeries via the genericra was pretty so-so and ended up using  the MQ
>> base classes instead.  If you are creating a performance-sensitive  app,
>> this may be of consideration for you.
>
> Ah - is there a Resource Adaptor for MQ from IBM? If so do you have  the
> class names - then we can add it to the wiki to help other MQ users.

I don't believe there is one, other than integrated with WebSphere. When
I said "base classes" I meant the base MQ java implementation that does
not use the JMS APIs (and therefore cannot be used from Jencks).  IBM's
JMS APIs, AFAIK, wrap their base APIs.

Cheers,
Raman

[ccpatras]

Could you post your spring configuration.  I am using MQSeries 5.3 patched to 13.  

Raman Gupta wrote:

James Strachan wrote:
>
> On 24 Nov 2005, at 06:05, Raman Gupta wrote:
>
>> James Strachan wrote:
>>
>>> On 23 Nov 2005, at 18:14, Subramaniam, Parthiban wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi James, Forgive me for being thick, i could not find any examples
>>>> with regards to Websphere MQ most of  them were for ActiveMQ
>>>>
>>>> is there anything regardsing Websphere MQ?
>>>>
>>> Use the GenericJMSRA...
>>>
>>> and just change the JMS ConnectionFactory to instantiate the MQSeries
>>> connection factory instead.
>>
>> I can confirm this works.  Though, to be honest, I found the  performance
>> of MQSeries via the genericra was pretty so-so and ended up using  the MQ
>> base classes instead.  If you are creating a performance-sensitive  app,
>> this may be of consideration for you.
>
> Ah - is there a Resource Adaptor for MQ from IBM? If so do you have  the
> class names - then we can add it to the wiki to help other MQ users.

I don't believe there is one, other than integrated with WebSphere. When
I said "base classes" I meant the base MQ java implementation that does
not use the JMS APIs (and therefore cannot be used from Jencks).  IBM's
JMS APIs, AFAIK, wrap their base APIs.

Cheers,
Raman