|
»
»
»
[VOTE] Struts 2.1.2 test build
|
View:
New views
19 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
[VOTE] Struts 2.1.2 test build
by mrdon
::
Rate this Message:
The Struts 2.1.2 test build is now available.
Release notes: * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-212.html Distribution: * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.2/ Maven 2 staging repository: * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.2/m2-staging-repository/ Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with a vote on its quality: [ ] Leave at test build [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] General Availability (GA) Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user list. Don --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.2 test build
by Antonio Petrelli-3
::
Rate this Message:
2008/5/2 Don Brown <mrdon@...>:
> [X] Alpha (+0) I vote +0 to Alpha because, from the License point of view, there are minor problems, but I did not test the build as a software artifact. Antonio --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.2 test build
by mrdon
::
Rate this Message:
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Don Brown <mrdon@...> wrote:
> [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [X] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) I don't think it is stable enough for a GA (and there are apparent licensing issues I guess), but I think it is good enough to be BETA and to get into our user's hands for more testing. Unless there are huge legal issues or show-stopping stability problems, we need to be getting these releases out to our community or we will never get a GA build. Remember, beta means it is feature complete but there are known issues, and I think that is what we have here. Don o > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. > A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality > of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote > designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user > list. > > Don > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.2 test build
by Don Brown-2
::
Rate this Message:
What license issues do you see exactly? The RAT tool passed, which
checks all the code for headers, and that is really what matters. If it is just some issues about licenses on test or example code, I don't see how that would provoke an alpha label. Don On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Antonio Petrelli <antonio.petrelli@...> wrote: > 2008/5/2 Don Brown <mrdon@...>: > > [X] Alpha (+0) > > I vote +0 to Alpha because, from the License point of view, there are > minor problems, but I did not test the build as a software artifact. > > Antonio > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.2 test build
by Antonio Petrelli-3
::
Rate this Message:
2008/5/2 Don Brown <mrdon@...>:
> What license issues do you see exactly? The RAT tool passed, which > checks all the code for headers, and that is really what matters. If > it is just some issues about licenses on test or example code, I don't > see how that would provoke an alpha label. You disabled RAT in 2.1.2, and I re-enabled in trunk, right? Antonio --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.2 test build
by Antonio Petrelli-3
::
Rate this Message:
2008/5/2 Don Brown <mrdon@...>:
> Remember, beta means it is feature complete but there are > known issues, and I think that is what we have here. Well, not completely correct. Beta also means that the API won't change much, while Alpha means that the API can change a lot. Antonio --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.2 test build
by Don Brown-2
::
Rate this Message:
Yep, and it won't. This is basically what the GA release will look
like minus the bugs (hopefully). No more API changes. Don On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Antonio Petrelli <antonio.petrelli@...> wrote: > 2008/5/2 Don Brown <mrdon@...>: > > > Remember, beta means it is feature complete but there are > > known issues, and I think that is what we have here. > > Well, not completely correct. Beta also means that the API won't > change much, while Alpha means that the API can change a lot. > > > > Antonio > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.2 test build
by Don Brown-2
::
Rate this Message:
I disabled it for the Struts 2.1.1 build, but I just rolled the Struts
2.1.2 build a hour or so ago from trunk, which has the RAT plugin enabled for releases. Don On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Antonio Petrelli <antonio.petrelli@...> wrote: > 2008/5/2 Don Brown <mrdon@...>: > > > What license issues do you see exactly? The RAT tool passed, which > > checks all the code for headers, and that is really what matters. If > > it is just some issues about licenses on test or example code, I don't > > see how that would provoke an alpha label. > > You disabled RAT in 2.1.2, and I re-enabled in trunk, right? > > > > Antonio > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.2 test build
by Antonio Petrelli-3
::
Rate this Message:
2008/5/2 Don Brown <mrdon@...>:
> I disabled it for the Struts 2.1.1 build, but I just rolled the Struts > 2.1.2 build a hour or so ago from trunk, which has the RAT plugin > enabled for releases. Ok :-) I change my vote to +0 for Beta (for the same reasons). Antonio --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.2 test build
by jmitchell
::
Rate this Message:
Also +1 for beta.
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 3:23 AM, Don Brown <mrdon@...> wrote: > On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Don Brown <mrdon@...> wrote: > > [ ] Leave at test build > > [ ] Alpha > > [X] Beta > > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > I don't think it is stable enough for a GA (and there are apparent > licensing issues I guess), but I think it is good enough to be BETA > and to get into our user's hands for more testing. Unless there are > huge legal issues or show-stopping stability problems, we need to be > getting these releases out to our community or we will never get a GA > build. Remember, beta means it is feature complete but there are > known issues, and I think that is what we have here. > > Don > > o > > > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > > > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. > > A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality > > of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote > > designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for > > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public > > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user > > list. > > > > Don > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > -- James Mitchell |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.2 test build
by James Holmes-2
::
Rate this Message:
+1
[X] Beta On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 1:12 AM, Don Brown <mrdon@...> wrote: > The Struts 2.1.2 test build is now available. > > Release notes: > * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-212.html > > Distribution: > * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.2/ > > Maven 2 staging repository: > * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.2/m2-staging-repository/ > > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond > with a vote on its quality: > > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. > A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality > of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote > designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user > list. > > Don > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.2 test build
by Pedro Herrera
::
Rate this Message:
+1 Beta
Herrera
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.2 test build
by Jeromy Evans - Blue Sky Minds
::
Rate this Message:
+1
[X] Beta --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.2 test build
by newton.dave
::
Rate this Message:
--- Don Brown <mrdon@...> wrote:
> [ X ] Beta Dave --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.2 test build
by alvins
::
Rate this Message:
+1
[X] Beta |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.2 test build
by Aixcept
::
Rate this Message:
+1 for Beta
Von meinem iPhone gesendet Am 02.05.2008 um 13:34 schrieb "James Mitchell" <jmitchtx@...>: > Also +1 for beta. > > On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 3:23 AM, Don Brown <mrdon@...> wrote: > >> On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Don Brown <mrdon@...> wrote: >>> [ ] Leave at test build >>> [ ] Alpha >>> [X] Beta >>> [ ] General Availability (GA) >> >> I don't think it is stable enough for a GA (and there are apparent >> licensing issues I guess), but I think it is good enough to be BETA >> and to get into our user's hands for more testing. Unless there are >> huge legal issues or show-stopping stability problems, we need to be >> getting these releases out to our community or we will never get a GA >> build. Remember, beta means it is feature complete but there are >> known issues, and I think that is what we have here. >> >> Don >> >> o >>> >>> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC >>> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least >>> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. >>> >>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon >>> request. >>> A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the >>> quality >>> of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote >>> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for >>> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public >>> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user >>> list. >>> >>> Don >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >> >> > > > -- > James Mitchell --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.2 test build
by Pedro Herrera
::
Rate this Message:
Are the vote open ? What´s the next step ? Will you announce to the user list about this beta release ?
Thanks Pedro
|
|
|
[RESULT] Struts 2.1.2 test build
by mrdon
::
Rate this Message:
The Struts 2.1.2 vote has passed with the following results:
+1 Beta: 5 binding, three non-binding +1 Beta: 1 binding I'm moving the release files over to the mirrors now and will announce the public release in 24 hours (or so). Don On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Don Brown <mrdon@...> wrote: > The Struts 2.1.2 test build is now available. > > Release notes: > * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-212.html > > Distribution: > * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.2/ > > Maven 2 staging repository: > * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.2/m2-staging-repository/ > > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond > with a vote on its quality: > > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. > A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality > of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote > designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user > list. > > Don > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [RESULT] Struts 2.1.2 test build
by James Holmes-2
::
Rate this Message:
Excellent news!
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Don Brown <mrdon@...> wrote: > The Struts 2.1.2 vote has passed with the following results: > > +1 Beta: 5 binding, three non-binding > +1 Beta: 1 binding > > I'm moving the release files over to the mirrors now and will announce > the public release in 24 hours (or so). > > Don > > |
