[VOTE][RESULT] Release Maven Surefire version 2.4.3

[dfabulich]

Vote passed.

+1 binding: Dan Fabulich, Herve Boutemy, Brett Porter, Olivier Lamy,
Fabrizio Giustina
+1 non-binding: Dan Tran

I'll stage the artifacts.

-Dan

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 14:14:19 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
From: Dan Fabulich <dan@...>
Reply-To: Maven Developers List <dev@...>
To: Maven Developers List <dev@...>
Subject: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire version 2.4.3


Hi,

We solved 11 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541&styleName=Html&version=14255

There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10541&status=1

Staging repo:
http://people.apache.org/~dfabulich/staging-repo/

Guide to testing staged releases:
http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html

Vote open for 72 hours.

[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...

[Christian Edward Gruber-2]

Congrats.

Moving on to future efforts, I added the final step in support for  
setup/teardown of fixture in the PojoTestSet.  I logged this bug (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-498 
) [with patch supplied] and called it a bug since everything was  
prepped as if it would execute fixture methods, but it has empty  
implementation from the appropriate invoker methods.   So I hijacked  
the "find test* methods" process to also look for "setUp" and  
"tearDown" and stored them for later execution by these invoker  
methods.  I also put in some docs for this in the plugin .apt files.  
I'd really love to see it included in the next version, as it's not a  
big change, but really makes my tests cleaner.

regards,
Christian.

On 13-May-08, at 14:20 , Dan Fabulich wrote:

>
> Vote passed.
>
> +1 binding: Dan Fabulich, Herve Boutemy, Brett Porter, Olivier Lamy,  
> Fabrizio Giustina
> +1 non-binding: Dan Tran
>
> I'll stage the artifacts.
>
> -Dan
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 14:14:19 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
> From: Dan Fabulich <dan@...>
> Reply-To: Maven Developers List <dev@...>
> To: Maven Developers List <dev@...>
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire version 2.4.3
>
>
> Hi,
>
> We solved 11 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541&styleName=Html&version=14255
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10541&status=1
>
> Staging repo:
> http://people.apache.org/~dfabulich/staging-repo/
>
> Guide to testing staged releases:
> http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html
>
> Vote open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...

[dfabulich]

Christian Edward Gruber wrote:

> Moving on to future efforts, I added the final step in support for
> setup/teardown of fixture in the PojoTestSet.

Patch appreciated; it will be considered for the next Surefire version.

I didn't know people really used the Pojo tests, partly because I've never
understood what they're good for.  Why not just use JUnit?

-Dan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...

[Christian Edward Gruber-2]

Very constrained environment.  No 1.5 and preferences for fewer  
imports.  Probably not a big deal, but I was doing a fairly narrow  
thing for a client, and JUnit and TestNG both added complexity to what  
I was doing.  Probably won't ever use them again, but I mostly can't  
see the advantage of JUnit over POJO in maven, except for UI  
convenience.  TestNG, on the other hand, can do thread-pooled tests,  
so I will often use that.

Christian.

On 13-May-08, at 21:18 , Dan Fabulich wrote:

> Christian Edward Gruber wrote:
>
>> Moving on to future efforts, I added the final step in support for  
>> setup/teardown of fixture in the PojoTestSet.
>
> Patch appreciated; it will be considered for the next Surefire  
> version.
>
> I didn't know people really used the Pojo tests, partly because I've  
> never understood what they're good for.  Why not just use JUnit?
>
> -Dan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...