[VOTE] Clarify PPMC votes (Incubator Policy)

View: New views
10 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

[VOTE] Clarify PPMC votes (Incubator Policy)

by Craig L Russell :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

While updating the PPMC new committer voting guide, I notice that  
there has been no recent action on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-72

An affirmative vote is required to change the policy, which currently  
confuses the role of the PPMC and the incubator PMC. The patch simply  
removes the text "and only the PPMC member votes are binding".

Index: site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml
===================================================================
--- site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml (revision 618386)
+++ site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml (working copy)
@@ -457,9 +457,8 @@
  the Podling SHALL hold a vote on the Podling's public -dev list. At  
least
  three +1 votes are required (see the
  <a href="http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html">Apache Voting  
Process</a>
-page),
-and only the PPMC member
-votes are binding. If the majority of all votes is positive, then the  
Podling
+page).
+If the majority of all votes is positive, then the Podling
  SHALL send a
  summary of that vote to the Incubator's
  <a href="howtoparticipate.html#Mailing+lists">general</a>

This vote will conclude on Monday June 30.

Here's my +1.

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@...
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!



smime.p7s (3K) Download Attachment

Re: [VOTE] Clarify PPMC votes (Incubator Policy)

by Bertrand Delacretaz :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@...> wrote:
> Index: site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml...

+1 to the proposed patch, thanks for this.
-Bertrand

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@...


RE: [VOTE] Clarify PPMC votes (Incubator Policy)

by JAMES Nightly Build System :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

+1

        --- Noel

smime.p7s (3K) Download Attachment

Re: [VOTE] Clarify PPMC votes (Incubator Policy)

by Martijn Dashorst :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

+1

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@...> wrote:

> While updating the PPMC new committer voting guide, I notice that there has
> been no recent action on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-72
>
> An affirmative vote is required to change the policy, which currently
> confuses the role of the PPMC and the incubator PMC. The patch simply
> removes the text "and only the PPMC member votes are binding".
>
> Index: site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml
> ===================================================================
> --- site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml        (revision 618386)
> +++ site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml        (working copy)
> @@ -457,9 +457,8 @@
>  the Podling SHALL hold a vote on the Podling's public -dev list. At least
>  three +1 votes are required (see the
>  <a href="http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html">Apache Voting
> Process</a>
> -page),
> -and only the PPMC member
> -votes are binding. If the majority of all votes is positive, then the
> Podling
> +page).
> +If the majority of all votes is positive, then the Podling
>  SHALL send a
>  summary of that vote to the Incubator's
>  <a href="howtoparticipate.html#Mailing+lists">general</a>
>
> This vote will conclude on Monday June 30.
>
> Here's my +1.
>
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@...
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>



--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.3.3 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.3

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@...


Re: [VOTE] Clarify PPMC votes (Incubator Policy)

by robert burrell donkin-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell@...> wrote:
> While updating the PPMC new committer voting guide, I notice that there has
> been no recent action on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-72
>
> An affirmative vote is required to change the policy, which currently
> confuses the role of the PPMC and the incubator PMC. The patch simply
> removes the text "and only the PPMC member votes are binding".

+1

thanks

- robert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@...


Re: [VOTE] Clarify PPMC votes (Incubator Policy)

by Matt Hogstrom :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

+1

On Jun 26, 2008, at 3:58 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:

> While updating the PPMC new committer voting guide, I notice that  
> there has been no recent action on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-72
>
> An affirmative vote is required to change the policy, which  
> currently confuses the role of the PPMC and the incubator PMC. The  
> patch simply removes the text "and only the PPMC member votes are  
> binding".
>
> Index: site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml
> ===================================================================
> --- site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml (revision 618386)
> +++ site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml (working copy)
> @@ -457,9 +457,8 @@
> the Podling SHALL hold a vote on the Podling's public -dev list. At  
> least
> three +1 votes are required (see the
> <a href="http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html">Apache Voting  
> Process</a>
> -page),
> -and only the PPMC member
> -votes are binding. If the majority of all votes is positive, then  
> the Podling
> +page).
> +If the majority of all votes is positive, then the Podling
> SHALL send a
> summary of that vote to the Incubator's
> <a href="howtoparticipate.html#Mailing+lists">general</a>
>
> This vote will conclude on Monday June 30.
>
> Here's my +1.
>
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@...
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>


Re: [VOTE] Clarify PPMC votes (Incubator Policy)

by Jean T. Anderson :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

+1

 -jean

Craig L Russell wrote:

> While updating the PPMC new committer voting guide, I notice that
> there has been no recent action on
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-72
>
> An affirmative vote is required to change the policy, which currently
> confuses the role of the PPMC and the incubator PMC. The patch simply
> removes the text "and only the PPMC member votes are binding".
>
> Index: site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml
> ===================================================================
> --- site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml    (revision 618386)
> +++ site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml    (working copy)
> @@ -457,9 +457,8 @@
>  the Podling SHALL hold a vote on the Podling's public -dev list. At
> least
>  three +1 votes are required (see the
>  <a href="http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html">Apache Voting
> Process</a>
> -page),
> -and only the PPMC member
> -votes are binding. If the majority of all votes is positive, then the
> Podling
> +page).
> +If the majority of all votes is positive, then the Podling
>  SHALL send a
>  summary of that vote to the Incubator's
>  <a href="howtoparticipate.html#Mailing+lists">general</a>
>
> This vote will conclude on Monday June 30.
>
> Here's my +1.
>
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@...
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@...


Re: [VOTE] Clarify PPMC votes (Incubator Policy)

by dims :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

+1

On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Jean T. Anderson <jta@...> wrote:

> +1
>
> -jean
>
> Craig L Russell wrote:
>>
>> While updating the PPMC new committer voting guide, I notice that there
>> has been no recent action on
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-72
>>
>> An affirmative vote is required to change the policy, which currently
>> confuses the role of the PPMC and the incubator PMC. The patch simply
>> removes the text "and only the PPMC member votes are binding".
>>
>> Index: site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml
>> ===================================================================
>> --- site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml    (revision 618386)
>> +++ site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml    (working copy)
>> @@ -457,9 +457,8 @@
>>  the Podling SHALL hold a vote on the Podling's public -dev list. At least
>>  three +1 votes are required (see the
>>  <a href="http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html">Apache Voting
>> Process</a>
>> -page),
>> -and only the PPMC member
>> -votes are binding. If the majority of all votes is positive, then the
>> Podling
>> +page).
>> +If the majority of all votes is positive, then the Podling
>>  SHALL send a
>>  summary of that vote to the Incubator's
>>  <a href="howtoparticipate.html#Mailing+lists">general</a>
>>
>> This vote will conclude on Monday June 30.
>>
>> Here's my +1.
>>
>> Craig Russell
>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@...
>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@...
>
>



--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@...


Re: [VOTE] Clarify PPMC votes (Incubator Policy)

by Luciano Resende :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

+1 (non-binding)

On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@...> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Jean T. Anderson <jta@...> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> -jean
>>
>> Craig L Russell wrote:
>>>
>>> While updating the PPMC new committer voting guide, I notice that there
>>> has been no recent action on
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-72
>>>
>>> An affirmative vote is required to change the policy, which currently
>>> confuses the role of the PPMC and the incubator PMC. The patch simply
>>> removes the text "and only the PPMC member votes are binding".
>>>
>>> Index: site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml    (revision 618386)
>>> +++ site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml    (working copy)
>>> @@ -457,9 +457,8 @@
>>>  the Podling SHALL hold a vote on the Podling's public -dev list. At least
>>>  three +1 votes are required (see the
>>>  <a href="http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html">Apache Voting
>>> Process</a>
>>> -page),
>>> -and only the PPMC member
>>> -votes are binding. If the majority of all votes is positive, then the
>>> Podling
>>> +page).
>>> +If the majority of all votes is positive, then the Podling
>>>  SHALL send a
>>>  summary of that vote to the Incubator's
>>>  <a href="howtoparticipate.html#Mailing+lists">general</a>
>>>
>>> This vote will conclude on Monday June 30.
>>>
>>> Here's my +1.
>>>
>>> Craig Russell
>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@...
>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@...
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@...
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@...
>
>



--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@...


[RESULT] [VOTE] Clarify PPMC votes (Incubator Policy)

by Craig L Russell :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

The following binding votes were cast in favor (+1):

Craig Russell
Bertrand Delacretaz
Martijn Dashorst
Robert Burrell Donkin
Matt Hogstrom
Jean T. Anderson
Davanum Srinivas

The following non-binding vote was cast in favor (+1):
Luciano Resende

No other votes were cast.

The vote passes. The policy will be updated.

Craig

On Jun 26, 2008, at 12:58 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:

> While updating the PPMC new committer voting guide, I notice that  
> there has been no recent action on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-72
>
> An affirmative vote is required to change the policy, which  
> currently confuses the role of the PPMC and the incubator PMC. The  
> patch simply removes the text "and only the PPMC member votes are  
> binding".
>
> Index: site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml
> ===================================================================
> --- site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml (revision 618386)
> +++ site-author/incubation/Incubation_Policy.xml (working copy)
> @@ -457,9 +457,8 @@
> the Podling SHALL hold a vote on the Podling's public -dev list. At  
> least
> three +1 votes are required (see the
> <a href="http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html">Apache Voting  
> Process</a>
> -page),
> -and only the PPMC member
> -votes are binding. If the majority of all votes is positive, then  
> the Podling
> +page).
> +If the majority of all votes is positive, then the Podling
> SHALL send a
> summary of that vote to the Incubator's
> <a href="howtoparticipate.html#Mailing+lists">general</a>
>
> This vote will conclude on Monday June 30.
>
> Here's my +1.
>
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@...
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@...
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!



smime.p7s (3K) Download Attachment
LightInTheBox - Buy quality products at wholesale price!