[VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.2-incubating

[Michael Baessler]

The Apache UIMA committers ask the Apache Incubator PMC for permission to publish a new bug fix
release of Apache UIMA version 2.2.2. This release contains bug fixes of for release version 2.2.1
that was published in December 2007. For details about the fixes, please have a look at the release
notes.

We had a vote on uima-dev that resulted in 6 binding +1s
(all the committers) and no 0s or -1s.  The vote thread
is here:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-uima-dev/200804.mbox/%3c47F74B4A.6070201@...%3e

Please review the release candidate here:
http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/

There are subdirectories like:
/bin - contains the binary distribution files
/src - contains the source distribution files
/rat - contains the RAT reports (using RAT 0.5.1) with some comments

The SVN tag for this release candidate is:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.2/uimaj-2.2.2-05

The KEYS file can be found in the SVN at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/src/main/readme/KEYS

Please vote:
[ ] +1  Accept to release Apache UIMA 2.2.2
[ ] -1  No, because....

Thanks!

-- Michael


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@...

[sebb-2-2]

On 10/04/2008, Michael Baessler <mba@...> wrote:

> The Apache UIMA committers ask the Apache Incubator PMC for permission to publish a new bug fix
>  release of Apache UIMA version 2.2.2. This release contains bug fixes of for release version 2.2.1
>  that was published in December 2007. For details about the fixes, please have a look at the release
>  notes.
>
>  We had a vote on uima-dev that resulted in 6 binding +1s
>  (all the committers) and no 0s or -1s.  The vote thread
>  is here:
>  http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-uima-dev/200804.mbox/%3c47F74B4A.6070201@...%3e
>
>  Please review the release candidate here:
>  http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/
>
>  There are subdirectories like:
>  /bin - contains the binary distribution files
>  /src - contains the source distribution files
>  /rat - contains the RAT reports (using RAT 0.5.1) with some comments

Not sure I agree that RELEASE_NOTES don't require an AL header.
It would not do any harm to add the header.

Problem building uimaj:

1) javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2

<...>

  Path to dependency:
        1) org.apache.uima:uimaj-adapter-soap:jar:2.2.2-incubating
        2) javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2

Should it not be using a more recent version, e.g. 1.1 ?


>  The SVN tag for this release candidate is:
>  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.2/uimaj-2.2.2-05
>
>  The KEYS file can be found in the SVN at:
>  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/src/main/readme/KEYS
>

See separate e-mail regarding eol-style settings.

Also, there are 3 .GIF files - the rest are all .gif. Could these be mistakes?

>  Please vote:
>  [ ] +1  Accept to release Apache UIMA 2.2.2
>  [ ] -1  No, because....
>
>  Thanks!
>
>  -- Michael
>
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@...
>  For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@...
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@...

[Kevan Miller]

Sources jars (e.g. http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/maven/org/apache/uima/jVinci/2.2.2-incubating/jVinci-2.2.2-incubating-sources.jar)
  are missing LICENSE/NOTICE files. Beyond this, I didn't see any  
problems.

--kevan
On Apr 10, 2008, at 5:44 AM, Michael Baessler wrote:

> The Apache UIMA committers ask the Apache Incubator PMC for  
> permission to publish a new bug fix
> release of Apache UIMA version 2.2.2. This release contains bug  
> fixes of for release version 2.2.1
> that was published in December 2007. For details about the fixes,  
> please have a look at the release
> notes.
>
> We had a vote on uima-dev that resulted in 6 binding +1s
> (all the committers) and no 0s or -1s.  The vote thread
> is here:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-uima-dev/200804.mbox/%3c47F74B4A.6070201@...%3e
>
> Please review the release candidate here:
> http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/
>
> There are subdirectories like:
> /bin - contains the binary distribution files
> /src - contains the source distribution files
> /rat - contains the RAT reports (using RAT 0.5.1) with some comments
>
> The SVN tag for this release candidate is:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.2/uimaj-2.2.2-05
>
> The KEYS file can be found in the SVN at:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/src/main/readme/KEYS
>
> Please vote:
> [ ] +1  Accept to release Apache UIMA 2.2.2
> [ ] -1  No, because....
>
> Thanks!
>
> -- Michael
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@...
>

[Michael Baessler]

That seems to be a build issue on my side. I missed a parameter when starting the build - sorry for
that.

I just created another build from the same SVN tag and replaced the files for the maven repository.
Now all seems to be correct!

-- Michael

Kevan Miller wrote:

> Sources jars (e.g.
> http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/maven/org/apache/uima/jVinci/2.2.2-incubating/jVinci-2.2.2-incubating-sources.jar) are
> missing LICENSE/NOTICE files. Beyond this, I didn't see any problems.
>
> --kevan
> On Apr 10, 2008, at 5:44 AM, Michael Baessler wrote:
>
>> The Apache UIMA committers ask the Apache Incubator PMC for permission
>> to publish a new bug fix
>> release of Apache UIMA version 2.2.2. This release contains bug fixes
>> of for release version 2.2.1
>> that was published in December 2007. For details about the fixes,
>> please have a look at the release
>> notes.
>>
>> We had a vote on uima-dev that resulted in 6 binding +1s
>> (all the committers) and no 0s or -1s.  The vote thread
>> is here:
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-uima-dev/200804.mbox/%3c47F74B4A.6070201@...%3e
>>
>>
>> Please review the release candidate here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/
>>
>> There are subdirectories like:
>> /bin - contains the binary distribution files
>> /src - contains the source distribution files
>> /rat - contains the RAT reports (using RAT 0.5.1) with some comments
>>
>> The SVN tag for this release candidate is:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.2/uimaj-2.2.2-05
>>
>>
>> The KEYS file can be found in the SVN at:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/src/main/readme/KEYS
>>
>>
>> Please vote:
>> [ ] +1  Accept to release Apache UIMA 2.2.2
>> [ ] -1  No, because....
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> -- Michael
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@...
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@...
>>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@...

[Michael Baessler]

sebb wrote:

> On 10/04/2008, Michael Baessler <mba@...> wrote:
>> The Apache UIMA committers ask the Apache Incubator PMC for permission to publish a new bug fix
>>  release of Apache UIMA version 2.2.2. This release contains bug fixes of for release version 2.2.1
>>  that was published in December 2007. For details about the fixes, please have a look at the release
>>  notes.
>>
>>  We had a vote on uima-dev that resulted in 6 binding +1s
>>  (all the committers) and no 0s or -1s.  The vote thread
>>  is here:
>>  http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-uima-dev/200804.mbox/%3c47F74B4A.6070201@...%3e
>>
>>  Please review the release candidate here:
>>  http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/
>>
>>  There are subdirectories like:
>>  /bin - contains the binary distribution files
>>  /src - contains the source distribution files
>>  /rat - contains the RAT reports (using RAT 0.5.1) with some comments
>
> Not sure I agree that RELEASE_NOTES don't require an AL header.
> It would not do any harm to add the header.
>

Most parts of the RELEASE_NOTES are generated using JIRA, so I thought we can apply the rule
mentioned on at http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html. But if you think it would be better to
have one, we will add a header next time. Hope that this is not a release stopper.

> Problem building uimaj:
>
> 1) javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2
>
> <...>
>
>   Path to dependency:
>         1) org.apache.uima:uimaj-adapter-soap:jar:2.2.2-incubating
>         2) javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2
>
> Should it not be using a more recent version, e.g. 1.1 ?
>

When I remember correctly, I think we explicitly use this version because of some license changes
for in the latter versions. Maybe some other UIMA committer can explain more detailed.

>
>>  The SVN tag for this release candidate is:
>>  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.2/uimaj-2.2.2-05
>>
>>  The KEYS file can be found in the SVN at:
>>  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/src/main/readme/KEYS
>>
>
> See separate e-mail regarding eol-style settings.
>
> Also, there are 3 .GIF files - the rest are all .gif. Could these be mistakes?

We don't see any issues during our testing of this components (CDE plugin) but we will change it for
the next release to lower case.

Thanks for checking our release!

-- Michael

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@...

[sebb-2-2]

On 11/04/2008, Michael Baessler <mba@...> wrote:

> sebb wrote:
>  > On 10/04/2008, Michael Baessler <mba@...> wrote:
>  >> The Apache UIMA committers ask the Apache Incubator PMC for permission to publish a new bug fix
>  >>  release of Apache UIMA version 2.2.2. This release contains bug fixes of for release version 2.2.1
>  >>  that was published in December 2007. For details about the fixes, please have a look at the release
>  >>  notes.
>  >>
>  >>  We had a vote on uima-dev that resulted in 6 binding +1s
>  >>  (all the committers) and no 0s or -1s.  The vote thread
>  >>  is here:
>  >>  http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-uima-dev/200804.mbox/%3c47F74B4A.6070201@...%3e
>  >>
>  >>  Please review the release candidate here:
>  >>  http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/
>  >>
>  >>  There are subdirectories like:
>  >>  /bin - contains the binary distribution files
>  >>  /src - contains the source distribution files
>  >>  /rat - contains the RAT reports (using RAT 0.5.1) with some comments
>  >
>  > Not sure I agree that RELEASE_NOTES don't require an AL header.
>  > It would not do any harm to add the header.
>  >
>
> Most parts of the RELEASE_NOTES are generated using JIRA, so I thought we can apply the rule

Which rule?

>  mentioned on at http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html. But if you think it would be better to
>  have one, we will add a header next time. Hope that this is not a release stopper.
>

"If in doubt add the AL header"

Not a blocker per se.

>
>  > Problem building uimaj:
>  >
>  > 1) javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2
>  >
>  > <...>
>  >
>  >   Path to dependency:
>  >         1) org.apache.uima:uimaj-adapter-soap:jar:2.2.2-incubating
>  >         2) javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2
>  >
>  > Should it not be using a more recent version, e.g. 1.1 ?
>  >
>
> When I remember correctly, I think we explicitly use this version because of some license changes
>  for in the latter versions. Maybe some other UIMA committer can explain more detailed.
>

Unfortunately only the POM and metadata are present in the M2 repo for
that version - the jar is not present. I raised a JIRA issue for this:

http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-2014

>
>  >
>  >>  The SVN tag for this release candidate is:
>  >>  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.2/uimaj-2.2.2-05
>  >>
>  >>  The KEYS file can be found in the SVN at:
>  >>  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/src/main/readme/KEYS
>  >>
>  >
>  > See separate e-mail regarding eol-style settings.
>  >
>  > Also, there are 3 .GIF files - the rest are all .gif. Could these be mistakes?
>
>
> We don't see any issues during our testing of this components (CDE plugin) but we will change it for
>  the next release to lower case.
>

Please!

>  Thanks for checking our release!
>
>
>  -- Michael
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@...
>  For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@...
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@...

[Adam Lally-2]

On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:10 AM, sebb <sebbaz@...> wrote:

> On 11/04/2008, Michael Baessler <mba@...> wrote:
>  > sebb wrote:
>  >  > Problem building uimaj:
>  >  >
>  >  > 1) javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2
>  >  >
>
>  Unfortunately only the POM and metadata are present in the M2 repo for
>  that version - the jar is not present. I raised a JIRA issue for this:
>
>  http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-2014
>
>

This is because Sun's license prevents this jar from being
redistributed from the central Maven repository:
http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-coping-with-sun-jars.html

In the build instructions on the UIMA website, we describe how to
obtain the jar yourself and add it to your local Maven repo:
http://incubator.apache.org/uima/svn.html#building.command.line

  -Adam

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@...

[dkulp]

On Friday 11 April 2008, Adam Lally wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:10 AM, sebb <sebbaz@...> wrote:
> > On 11/04/2008, Michael Baessler <mba@...> wrote:
> >  > sebb wrote:
> >  >  > Problem building uimaj:
> >  >  >
> >  >  > 1) javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2
> >
> >  Unfortunately only the POM and metadata are present in the M2 repo
> > for that version - the jar is not present. I raised a JIRA issue for
> > this:
> >
> >  http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-2014
>
> This is because Sun's license prevents this jar from being
> redistributed from the central Maven repository:
> http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-coping-with-sun-jars.html
>
> In the build instructions on the UIMA website, we describe how to
> obtain the jar yourself and add it to your local Maven repo:
> http://incubator.apache.org/uima/svn.html#building.command.line

Any particular reason you don't exclude this dependency in you poms and
then pull in a version that IS available.  Either the 1.1 version from
java.net:
http://download.java.net/maven/1/javax.activation/jars/

or the geronimo-specs version available at central:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/

(In general, I prefer the geronimo specs versions, but it doesn't really
matter)

--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer, IONA
dkulp@...
http://www.dankulp.com/blog

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@...

[Michael Baessler]

sebb wrote:

> On 11/04/2008, Michael Baessler <mba@...> wrote:
>> sebb wrote:
>>  > On 10/04/2008, Michael Baessler <mba@...> wrote:
>>  >> The Apache UIMA committers ask the Apache Incubator PMC for permission to publish a new bug fix
>>  >>  release of Apache UIMA version 2.2.2. This release contains bug fixes of for release version 2.2.1
>>  >>  that was published in December 2007. For details about the fixes, please have a look at the release
>>  >>  notes.
>>  >>
>>  >>  We had a vote on uima-dev that resulted in 6 binding +1s
>>  >>  (all the committers) and no 0s or -1s.  The vote thread
>>  >>  is here:
>>  >>  http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-uima-dev/200804.mbox/%3c47F74B4A.6070201@...%3e
>>  >>
>>  >>  Please review the release candidate here:
>>  >>  http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/
>>  >>
>>  >>  There are subdirectories like:
>>  >>  /bin - contains the binary distribution files
>>  >>  /src - contains the source distribution files
>>  >>  /rat - contains the RAT reports (using RAT 0.5.1) with some comments
>>  >
>>  > Not sure I agree that RELEASE_NOTES don't require an AL header.
>>  > It would not do any harm to add the header.
>>  >
>>
>> Most parts of the RELEASE_NOTES are generated using JIRA, so I thought we can apply the rule
>
> Which rule?

What files in an Apache release do not require a license header?

A file without any degree of creativity in either its literal elements or its structure is not
protected by copyright law; therefore, such a file does not require a license header. If in doubt
about the extent of the file's creativity, add the license header to the file.

>
>>  mentioned on at http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html. But if you think it would be better to
>>  have one, we will add a header next time. Hope that this is not a release stopper.
>>
>

-- Michael

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@...

[Thilo Goetz]

Daniel Kulp wrote:

> On Friday 11 April 2008, Adam Lally wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:10 AM, sebb <sebbaz@...> wrote:
>>> On 11/04/2008, Michael Baessler <mba@...> wrote:
>>>  > sebb wrote:
>>>  >  > Problem building uimaj:
>>>  >  >
>>>  >  > 1) javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2
>>>
>>>  Unfortunately only the POM and metadata are present in the M2 repo
>>> for that version - the jar is not present. I raised a JIRA issue for
>>> this:
>>>
>>>  http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-2014
>> This is because Sun's license prevents this jar from being
>> redistributed from the central Maven repository:
>> http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-coping-with-sun-jars.html
>>
>> In the build instructions on the UIMA website, we describe how to
>> obtain the jar yourself and add it to your local Maven repo:
>> http://incubator.apache.org/uima/svn.html#building.command.line
>
> Any particular reason you don't exclude this dependency in you poms and
> then pull in a version that IS available.  Either the 1.1 version from
> java.net:
> http://download.java.net/maven/1/javax.activation/jars/
>
> or the geronimo-specs version available at central:
> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/
>
> (In general, I prefer the geronimo specs versions, but it doesn't really
> matter)
>

If that works, it'll be vastly preferable to the manual do-hicky
we have now.  We'll follow up on uima-dev.

Thanks,
Thilo

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@...

[sebb-2-2]

On 11/04/2008, Thilo Goetz <twgoetz@...> wrote:

> Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> > On Friday 11 April 2008, Adam Lally wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:10 AM, sebb <sebbaz@...> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 11/04/2008, Michael Baessler <mba@...> wrote:
> > > >  > sebb wrote:
> > > >  >  > Problem building uimaj:
> > > >  >  >
> > > >  >  > 1) javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2
> > > >
> > > >  Unfortunately only the POM and metadata are present in the M2 repo
> > > > for that version - the jar is not present. I raised a JIRA issue for
> > > > this:
> > > >
> > > >  http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-2014
> > > >
> > > This is because Sun's license prevents this jar from being
> > > redistributed from the central Maven repository:
> > >
> http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-coping-with-sun-jars.html
> > >
> > > In the build instructions on the UIMA website, we describe how to
> > > obtain the jar yourself and add it to your local Maven repo:
> > >
> http://incubator.apache.org/uima/svn.html#building.command.line
> > >
> >
> > Any particular reason you don't exclude this dependency in you poms and
> then pull in a version that IS available.  Either the 1.1 version from
> java.net:
> > http://download.java.net/maven/1/javax.activation/jars/
> >
> > or the geronimo-specs version available at central:
> > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/
> >
> > (In general, I prefer the geronimo specs versions, but it doesn't really
> matter)
> >
> >
>
>  If that works, it'll be vastly preferable to the manual do-hicky
>  we have now.  We'll follow up on uima-dev.
>

FYI: the Geronimo-specs approach works fine for building JMeter.

>  Thanks,
>  Thilo
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> general-unsubscribe@...
>  For additional commands, e-mail:
> general-help@...
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@...

[Marshall Schor]

sebb wrote:

> On 11/04/2008, Thilo Goetz <twgoetz@...> wrote:
>  
>> Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>
>>    
>>> On Friday 11 April 2008, Adam Lally wrote:
>>>
>>>      
>>>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:10 AM, sebb <sebbaz@...> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>> On 11/04/2008, Michael Baessler <mba@...> wrote:
>>>>>  > sebb wrote:
>>>>>  >  > Problem building uimaj:
>>>>>  >  >
>>>>>  >  > 1) javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2
>>>>>
>>>>>  Unfortunately only the POM and metadata are present in the M2 repo
>>>>> for that version - the jar is not present. I raised a JIRA issue for
>>>>> this:
>>>>>
>>>>>  http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-2014
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>> This is because Sun's license prevents this jar from being
>>>> redistributed from the central Maven repository:
>>>>
>>>>        
>> http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-coping-with-sun-jars.html
>>    
>>>> In the build instructions on the UIMA website, we describe how to
>>>> obtain the jar yourself and add it to your local Maven repo:
>>>>
>>>>        
>> http://incubator.apache.org/uima/svn.html#building.command.line
>>    
>>> Any particular reason you don't exclude this dependency in you poms and
>>>      
>> then pull in a version that IS available.  Either the 1.1 version from
>> java.net:
>>    
>>> http://download.java.net/maven/1/javax.activation/jars/
>>>
>>> or the geronimo-specs version available at central:
>>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/
>>>
>>> (In general, I prefer the geronimo specs versions, but it doesn't really
>>>      
>> matter)
>>    
>>>      
>>  If that works, it'll be vastly preferable to the manual do-hicky
>>  we have now.  We'll follow up on uima-dev.
>>
>>    
>
> FYI: the Geronimo-specs approach works fine for building JMeter.
>  

I changed the POM in the one project that references the
javax.activation, changing the dependency to
    <dependency>
      <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
      <artifactId>geronimo-activation_1.0.2_spec</artifactId>
      <version>1.2</version>
      <scope>compile</scope>
    </dependency>

This seems to have done the trick - is that all that we need to do?  
This artifact appears to be Apache v2 licensed.

-Marshall


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@...

[Michael Baessler]

Is there anything else needed from the UIMA team to get this release approved?

-- Michael

Michael Baessler wrote:

> That seems to be a build issue on my side. I missed a parameter when starting the build - sorry for
> that.
>
> I just created another build from the same SVN tag and replaced the files for the maven repository.
> Now all seems to be correct!
>
> -- Michael
>
> Kevan Miller wrote:
>> Sources jars (e.g.
>> http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/maven/org/apache/uima/jVinci/2.2.2-incubating/jVinci-2.2.2-incubating-sources.jar) are
>> missing LICENSE/NOTICE files. Beyond this, I didn't see any problems.
>>
>> --kevan
>> On Apr 10, 2008, at 5:44 AM, Michael Baessler wrote:
>>
>>> The Apache UIMA committers ask the Apache Incubator PMC for permission
>>> to publish a new bug fix
>>> release of Apache UIMA version 2.2.2. This release contains bug fixes
>>> of for release version 2.2.1
>>> that was published in December 2007. For details about the fixes,
>>> please have a look at the release
>>> notes.
>>>
>>> We had a vote on uima-dev that resulted in 6 binding +1s
>>> (all the committers) and no 0s or -1s.  The vote thread
>>> is here:
>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-uima-dev/200804.mbox/%3c47F74B4A.6070201@...%3e
>>>
>>>
>>> Please review the release candidate here:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/
>>>
>>> There are subdirectories like:
>>> /bin - contains the binary distribution files
>>> /src - contains the source distribution files
>>> /rat - contains the RAT reports (using RAT 0.5.1) with some comments
>>>
>>> The SVN tag for this release candidate is:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.2/uimaj-2.2.2-05
>>>
>>>
>>> The KEYS file can be found in the SVN at:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/src/main/readme/KEYS
>>>
>>>
>>> Please vote:
>>> [ ] +1  Accept to release Apache UIMA 2.2.2
>>> [ ] -1  No, because....
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> -- Michael
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@...
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@...
>>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@...
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@...

[Thilo Goetz]

Folks, just a quick reminder that this vote is still
open.  Please vote if you can find the time to look
at our release.  Thanks.

--Thilo

Michael Baessler wrote:

> The Apache UIMA committers ask the Apache Incubator PMC for permission to publish a new bug fix
> release of Apache UIMA version 2.2.2. This release contains bug fixes of for release version 2.2.1
> that was published in December 2007. For details about the fixes, please have a look at the release
> notes.
>
> We had a vote on uima-dev that resulted in 6 binding +1s
> (all the committers) and no 0s or -1s.  The vote thread
> is here:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-uima-dev/200804.mbox/%3c47F74B4A.6070201@...%3e
>
> Please review the release candidate here:
> http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/uimaj-2.2.2/05/
>
> There are subdirectories like:
> /bin - contains the binary distribution files
> /src - contains the source distribution files
> /rat - contains the RAT reports (using RAT 0.5.1) with some comments
>
> The SVN tag for this release candidate is:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.2/uimaj-2.2.2-05
>
> The KEYS file can be found in the SVN at:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/src/main/readme/KEYS
>
> Please vote:
> [ ] +1  Accept to release Apache UIMA 2.2.2
> [ ] -1  No, because....
>
> Thanks!
>
> -- Michael
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e