|
»
»
»
[VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.2.0 - RC2
|
View:
New views
14 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
[VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.2.0 - RC2
by Gary Tully
::
Rate this Message:
Hi Everyone,
I've cut a new release candidate for 5.2.0 Could you guys review the release artifacts and vote? The release notes are here: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+5.2.0+Release You can get the binary distributions here: http://people.apache.org/~gtully/staging-repos/activemq-5.2.0/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.2.0 The Maven2 repository is at: http://people.apache.org/~gtully/staging-repos/activemq-5.2.0 The Maven generated website for this version is at: http://people.apache.org/~gtully/staging-sites/activemq-5.2.0/maven/5.2.0 Source SVN tag: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/tags/activemq-5.2.0 Please vote to approve this release binary [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.2.0 [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments) Here's my +1 |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.2.0 - RC2
by Hans Bausewein
::
Rate this Message:
I've sent a few 100 messages with my test client and it seems fine, so far. On the master I got a: "Cannot lookup a consumer from a connection that had not been registered" and on the slave a: "IllegalStateException: Cannot lookup a consumer from a connection that had not been registered" but it seems related to a message to a queue "example.A" and I don't know where it came from. I think these errors would happen is a client connects to one host instead of using the failover URL. ... so or the time being a [0] if I may vote again |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.2.0 - RC2
by Hans Bausewein
::
Rate this Message:
The master has 1 consumer for this queue. while the slave has 3 but I don't know from where. Hans |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.2.0 - RC2
by James.Strachan
::
Rate this Message:
+1
looks good 2008/10/8 Gary Tully <gary.tully@...>: > Hi Everyone, > > I've cut a new release candidate for 5.2.0 > > Could you guys review the release artifacts and vote? > > The release notes are here: > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+5.2.0+Release > > You can get the binary distributions here: > http://people.apache.org/~gtully/staging-repos/activemq-5.2.0/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.2.0 > > The Maven2 repository is at: > http://people.apache.org/~gtully/staging-repos/activemq-5.2.0 > > The Maven generated website for this version is at: > http://people.apache.org/~gtully/staging-sites/activemq-5.2.0/maven/5.2.0 > > Source SVN tag: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/tags/activemq-5.2.0 > > Please vote to approve this release binary > > [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.2.0 > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments) > > Here's my +1 > -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration http://open.iona.com |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.2.0 - RC2
by Hans Bausewein
::
Rate this Message:
A -1 from me again :( See https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1970 It has improved a lot since RC1, but apparently the synchronization fails, when there are more than 200 messages in the queue. This also happens with a single client bean. Hans |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.2.0 - RC2
by Hans Bausewein
::
Rate this Message:
I think I have another: again a temporary queue is not deleted on the slave. It happened when an application exception occurred, so I think it is related to a rolled back transaction. When I solved the problem that caused the application exception I did not get more old temporary queues on the slave. Hans |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.2.0 - RC2
by jayson.minard
::
Rate this Message:
vote -1 due to this issue which still happens on RC2:
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1971 It isn't a very complicated setup, just higher volume with medium to large messages going through and it falls over due to a hole in resource protection around a queue paging.
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.2.0 - RC2
by jayson.minard
::
Rate this Message:
This regression is cosmetic but very harmful to the admin UI:
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1975 which adds to my negative vote. Although if I had to pick one to be right, the AMQ-1971 is the one.
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.2.0 - RC2
by jayson.minard
::
Rate this Message:
I have performed more testing and found another issue making me nervous about 5.2.0 RC2
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1976 Thanks, --j
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.2.0 - RC2
by Hans Bausewein
::
Rate this Message:
I've found the issue: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1979 The exceptions were a coincidence. It was just not happening as often as before. I think I can start the real testing, now :) Hans |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.2.0 - RC2
by honeybun
::
Rate this Message:
A few issues when using the new sslContext support.
- the default client.ks/broker.ks are self signed, fails I get PKIX validation exceptions on startup (I think). If I use proper certs (signed by a CA) then no exceptions. - The <sslContext> under <broker> seems to be evaluated immediately when the bean is read in, rather than when it is used to start the broker. This makes it difficult to have a sslContext params that comes out of a database (which I tried to do). If the sslcontext was evaluated lazily, the application could lookup some of the parameters from the DB and modify the bean before trying to start the embedded broker. - plain-text passwords for the keystore in the xml config file, typically not a good thing. I'm not sure how this is viewed within the apache dev community. - wish there was a way to lookup the SSL context using JNDI so it could be provisioned by the app server.
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.2.0 - RC2
by Gary Tully
::
Rate this Message:
2008/10/18 honeybun <jsands@...>:
> > A few issues when using the new sslContext support. > > - the default client.ks/broker.ks are self signed, fails I get PKIX > validation exceptions on startup (I think). If I use proper certs (signed > by a CA) then no exceptions. > the default certs are really only used (sufficient) for unit testing. > - The <sslContext> under <broker> seems to be evaluated immediately when > the bean is read in, rather than when it is used to start the broker. This > makes it difficult to have a sslContext params that comes out of a database > (which I tried to do). If the sslcontext was evaluated lazily, the > application could lookup some of the parameters from the DB and modify the > bean before trying to start the embedded broker. > The context is lazily initialised, on the first call to getSSLContext, which will be called the first time an ssl transport factory does some work. see source: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/broker/SslContext.java |
|
|
Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.2.0 - RC2
by hanson2010
::
Rate this Message:
+1
ActiveMQ versions should keep up with that of Camel. Now Camel 1.5 has been released. But current stable release of ActiveMQ (5.1) is still using Camel 1.3.
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ 5.2.0 - RC2
by Gary Tully
::
Rate this Message:
I will cut RC3 today and it will be from trunk, it will reference Camel 1.5.
2008/11/6 hanson2010 <hanson2010@...>: > > +1 > > ActiveMQ versions should keep up with that of Camel. Now Camel 1.5 has been > released. But current stable release of ActiveMQ (5.1) is still using Camel > 1.3. > > > > Gary Tully wrote: >> >> Hi Everyone, >> >> I've cut a new release candidate for 5.2.0 >> >> Could you guys review the release artifacts and vote? >> >> The release notes are here: >> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/ActiveMQ+5.2.0+Release >> >> You can get the binary distributions here: >> http://people.apache.org/~gtully/staging-repos/activemq-5.2.0/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.2.0 >> >> The Maven2 repository is at: >> http://people.apache.org/~gtully/staging-repos/activemq-5.2.0 >> >> The Maven generated website for this version is at: >> http://people.apache.org/~gtully/staging-sites/activemq-5.2.0/maven/5.2.0 >> >> Source SVN tag: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/tags/activemq-5.2.0 >> >> Please vote to approve this release binary >> >> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.2.0 >> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments) >> >> Here's my +1 >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--ActiveMQ-5.2.0---RC2-tp19874910p20355748.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > |
| Free Forum Powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
