[Fwd: NoSuchMethodException for GroupPeerManager.getNewGroup]

[David Wynter at roamware]

Sorry, sent the last one for an email not on the list.

Hi,

I have followed the instructions here. Using 2.3.1

http://turbine.apache.org/turbine/turbine-2.3.1/services/torque-security-service.html

To use an extended user class. But I am getting a NoSuchMethodException
on line 656 of GroupPeerManager.java

The method looks like this

    public static Group getNewGroup(Persistent p)
    {
        Group g = null;
        try
        {
            Class groupWrapperClass = TurbineSecurity.getGroupClass();

            Class [] clazz = new Class [] { Persistent.class };
            Object [] params = new Object [] { p };

            g = (Group) groupWrapperClass
                .getConstructor(clazz)
                .newInstance(params);
        }
        catch (Exception e)
        {
            log.error("Could not instantiate a new group from supplied
persistent: ", e);
        }

        return g;
    }

Reading the instructions on torque-security-service.html page it says

Group Implementation
org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.TorqueGroup
Peer org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineGroupPeer
Persistent object
org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineGroup



I am only using my own TurbineUser substitute, not any of the other
security classes, so I expect from this
" Turbine uses the following configuration for accessing the Torque
schema. If you just want to use the default Peers, you don't need any of
the following configuration, these are the defaults:" That it will use
the default stated above, so I am surprised to see it using "class
org.apache.turbine.om.security.TurbineGroup"

But the class being used is in fact sub class of BaseObject and
therefore does have an empty  constructor, so I cannot work out why it
is throwing this exception anyway?

here are the relevant sections of my TurbineResources.properties

services.SecurityService.classname =
org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.TorqueSecurityService
...
# This is the Peer class used to access the user peer
(org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineUserPeer)
services.SecurityService.user.manager =
org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.TorqueUserManager
services.SecurityService.torque.userPeer.class =
com.stpenable.se.om.ExtendedUserPeer
services.SecurityService.user.class =
com.stpenable.se.security.ExtendedUserImpl
database.maps.builder =
com.stpenable.se.util.db.map.TurbineMapBuilderAdapter
# This is the class that implements the ACL interface.
services.SecurityService.acl.class =
org.apache.turbine.util.security.TurbineAccessControlList


Is there some configuration the article does not mention?

thanks

David


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@...

[Tony Oslund-2]

Just a thought....

Instead of specifying just Group, try explicitly specifying the full
path to Group.

-----Original Message-----
From: David Wynter [mailto:david@...]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 4:27 AM
To: Turbine-User
Subject: [Fwd: NoSuchMethodException for GroupPeerManager.getNewGroup]

Sorry, sent the last one for an email not on the list.

Hi,

I have followed the instructions here. Using 2.3.1

http://turbine.apache.org/turbine/turbine-2.3.1/services/torque-security
-service.html

To use an extended user class. But I am getting a NoSuchMethodException
on line 656 of GroupPeerManager.java

The method looks like this

    public static Group getNewGroup(Persistent p)
    {
        Group g = null;
        try
        {
            Class groupWrapperClass = TurbineSecurity.getGroupClass();

            Class [] clazz = new Class [] { Persistent.class };
            Object [] params = new Object [] { p };

            g = (Group) groupWrapperClass
                .getConstructor(clazz)
                .newInstance(params);
        }
        catch (Exception e)
        {
            log.error("Could not instantiate a new group from supplied
persistent: ", e);
        }

        return g;
    }

Reading the instructions on torque-security-service.html page it says

Group Implementation
org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.TorqueGroup
Peer org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineGroupPeer
Persistent object
org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineGroup



I am only using my own TurbineUser substitute, not any of the other
security classes, so I expect from this
" Turbine uses the following configuration for accessing the Torque
schema. If you just want to use the default Peers, you don't need any of

the following configuration, these are the defaults:" That it will use
the default stated above, so I am surprised to see it using "class
org.apache.turbine.om.security.TurbineGroup"

But the class being used is in fact sub class of BaseObject and
therefore does have an empty  constructor, so I cannot work out why it
is throwing this exception anyway?

here are the relevant sections of my TurbineResources.properties

services.SecurityService.classname =
org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.TorqueSecurityService
...
# This is the Peer class used to access the user peer
(org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineUserPeer)
services.SecurityService.user.manager =
org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.TorqueUserManager
services.SecurityService.torque.userPeer.class =
com.stpenable.se.om.ExtendedUserPeer
services.SecurityService.user.class =
com.stpenable.se.security.ExtendedUserImpl
database.maps.builder =
com.stpenable.se.util.db.map.TurbineMapBuilderAdapter
# This is the class that implements the ACL interface.
services.SecurityService.acl.class =
org.apache.turbine.util.security.TurbineAccessControlList


Is there some configuration the article does not mention?

thanks

David


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@...


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@...

[David Wynter at roamware]

Hi,

I do not follow you? Nowhere do I specify anything to do with changing
the Group from the std default class. This is the standard framework
behaving like this. The only changes I have made are to do with
replacing TurbineUser with my own extended class. How many people have
attempted to extend from TurbineUser based on those instructions?

I now understand a little more. I cannot work out how this ever worked
to tell you the truth. This reflection work here

            g = (Group) groupWrapperClass
                .getConstructor(clazz)
                .newInstance(params);

Is expecting to find a constructor that takes this

Class [] clazz = new Class [] { Persistent.class };

as a argument, and the class Turbine Security service is using,
"org.apache.turbine.om.security.TurbineGroup"
simply does not have that constructor. But then again neither does the
class the documentation tells me it should be using,
"org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineGroup" have that
constructor, so how can this ever work? Am I misinterpreting the
constructor signature required?

David



Tony Oslund wrote:

> Just a thought....
>
> Instead of specifying just Group, try explicitly specifying the full
> path to Group.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Wynter [mailto:david@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 4:27 AM
> To: Turbine-User
> Subject: [Fwd: NoSuchMethodException for GroupPeerManager.getNewGroup]
>
> Sorry, sent the last one for an email not on the list.
>
> Hi,
>
> I have followed the instructions here. Using 2.3.1
>
> http://turbine.apache.org/turbine/turbine-2.3.1/services/torque-security
> -service.html
>
> To use an extended user class. But I am getting a NoSuchMethodException
> on line 656 of GroupPeerManager.java
>
> The method looks like this
>
>     public static Group getNewGroup(Persistent p)
>     {
>         Group g = null;
>         try
>         {
>             Class groupWrapperClass = TurbineSecurity.getGroupClass();
>
>             Class [] clazz = new Class [] { Persistent.class };
>             Object [] params = new Object [] { p };
>
>             g = (Group) groupWrapperClass
>                 .getConstructor(clazz)
>                 .newInstance(params);
>         }
>         catch (Exception e)
>         {
>             log.error("Could not instantiate a new group from supplied
> persistent: ", e);
>         }
>
>         return g;
>     }
>
> Reading the instructions on torque-security-service.html page it says
>
> Group Implementation
> org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.TorqueGroup
> Peer org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineGroupPeer
> Persistent object
> org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineGroup
>
>
>
> I am only using my own TurbineUser substitute, not any of the other
> security classes, so I expect from this
> " Turbine uses the following configuration for accessing the Torque
> schema. If you just want to use the default Peers, you don't need any of
>
> the following configuration, these are the defaults:" That it will use
> the default stated above, so I am surprised to see it using "class
> org.apache.turbine.om.security.TurbineGroup"
>
> But the class being used is in fact sub class of BaseObject and
> therefore does have an empty  constructor, so I cannot work out why it
> is throwing this exception anyway?
>
> here are the relevant sections of my TurbineResources.properties
>
> services.SecurityService.classname =
> org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.TorqueSecurityService
> ...
> # This is the Peer class used to access the user peer
> (org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineUserPeer)
> services.SecurityService.user.manager =
> org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.TorqueUserManager
> services.SecurityService.torque.userPeer.class =
> com.stpenable.se.om.ExtendedUserPeer
> services.SecurityService.user.class =
> com.stpenable.se.security.ExtendedUserImpl
> database.maps.builder =
> com.stpenable.se.util.db.map.TurbineMapBuilderAdapter
> # This is the class that implements the ACL interface.
> services.SecurityService.acl.class =
> org.apache.turbine.util.security.TurbineAccessControlList
>
>
> Is there some configuration the article does not mention?
>
> thanks
>
> David
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@...
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@...
>
>
>  

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@...

[stpdave]

Hi,

I thought I'd better get the Turbine source for V2.3.1 to see what is going on fully for my problem. No mirrors have it or any version for that matter, marc as stopped archiving the Turbine lists. Seems since going to a full project things have gone backwards. The apache list archives link is broken. What a mess!

David

David Wynter wrote:

Hi,

I do not follow you? Nowhere do I specify anything to do with changing the Group from the std default class. This is the standard framework behaving like this. The only changes I have made are to do with replacing TurbineUser with my own extended class. How many people have attempted to extend from TurbineUser based on those instructions?

I now understand a little more. I cannot work out how this ever worked to tell you the truth. This reflection work here

           g = (Group) groupWrapperClass
               .getConstructor(clazz)
               .newInstance(params);

Is expecting to find a constructor that takes this

Class [] clazz = new Class [] { Persistent.class };

as a argument, and the class Turbine Security service is using, "org.apache.turbine.om.security.TurbineGroup"
simply does not have that constructor. But then again neither does the class the documentation tells me it should be using, "org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineGroup" have that constructor, so how can this ever work? Am I misinterpreting the constructor signature required?

David



Tony Oslund wrote:

Just a thought....

Instead of specifying just Group, try explicitly specifying the full
path to Group.

-----Original Message-----
From: David Wynter [david@...] Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 4:27 AM
To: Turbine-User
Subject: [Fwd: NoSuchMethodException for GroupPeerManager.getNewGroup]

Sorry, sent the last one for an email not on the list.

Hi,

I have followed the instructions here. Using 2.3.1

http://turbine.apache.org/turbine/turbine-2.3.1/services/torque-security
-service.html

To use an extended user class. But I am getting a NoSuchMethodException on line 656 of GroupPeerManager.java

The method looks like this

    public static Group getNewGroup(Persistent p)
    {
        Group g = null;
        try
        {
            Class groupWrapperClass = TurbineSecurity.getGroupClass();

            Class [] clazz = new Class [] { Persistent.class };
            Object [] params = new Object [] { p };

            g = (Group) groupWrapperClass
                .getConstructor(clazz)
                .newInstance(params);
        }
        catch (Exception e)
        {
            log.error("Could not instantiate a new group from supplied persistent: ", e);
        }

        return g;
    }

Reading the instructions on torque-security-service.html page it says

Group     Implementation org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.TorqueGroup
Peer     org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineGroupPeer
Persistent object org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineGroup



I am only using my own TurbineUser substitute, not any of the other security classes, so I expect from this
" Turbine uses the following configuration for accessing the Torque schema. If you just want to use the default Peers, you don't need any of

the following configuration, these are the defaults:" That it will use the default stated above, so I am surprised to see it using "class org.apache.turbine.om.security.TurbineGroup"

But the class being used is in fact sub class of BaseObject and therefore does have an empty  constructor, so I cannot work out why it is throwing this exception anyway?

here are the relevant sections of my TurbineResources.properties

services.SecurityService.classname = org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.TorqueSecurityService
...
# This is the Peer class used to access the user peer (org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineUserPeer)
services.SecurityService.user.manager = org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.TorqueUserManager
services.SecurityService.torque.userPeer.class = com.stpenable.se.om.ExtendedUserPeer
services.SecurityService.user.class = com.stpenable.se.security.ExtendedUserImpl
database.maps.builder = com.stpenable.se.util.db.map.TurbineMapBuilderAdapter
# This is the class that implements the ACL interface.
services.SecurityService.acl.class = org.apache.turbine.util.security.TurbineAccessControlList


Is there some configuration the article does not mention?

thanks

David


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@...


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@...


 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@...

--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@...

[Tony Oslund-2]

I had downloaded some of the v2.3.1 source a couple of years back.  For
whatever reason I still have it.

 

I have both zip and tar.  Should I send it to email listed here?

 

________________________________

From: David Wynter [mailto:david@...]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 10:53 AM
To: Turbine Users List
Subject: Re: [Fwd: NoSuchMethodException for
GroupPeerManager.getNewGroup]

 

Hi,

I thought I'd better get the Turbine source for V2.3.1 to see what is
going on fully for my problem. No mirrors have it or any version for
that matter, marc as stopped archiving the Turbine lists. Seems since
going to a full project things have gone backwards. The apache list
archives link is broken. What a mess!

David

David Wynter wrote:

Hi,

I do not follow you? Nowhere do I specify anything to do with changing
the Group from the std default class. This is the standard framework
behaving like this. The only changes I have made are to do with
replacing TurbineUser with my own extended class. How many people have
attempted to extend from TurbineUser based on those instructions?

I now understand a little more. I cannot work out how this ever worked
to tell you the truth. This reflection work here

           g = (Group) groupWrapperClass
               .getConstructor(clazz)
               .newInstance(params);

Is expecting to find a constructor that takes this

Class [] clazz = new Class [] { Persistent.class };

as a argument, and the class Turbine Security service is using,
"org.apache.turbine.om.security.TurbineGroup"
simply does not have that constructor. But then again neither does the
class the documentation tells me it should be using,
"org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineGroup" have that
constructor, so how can this ever work? Am I misinterpreting the
constructor signature required?

David



Tony Oslund wrote:



Just a thought....

Instead of specifying just Group, try explicitly specifying the full
path to Group.

-----Original Message-----
From: David Wynter [mailto:david@...] Sent: Tuesday, August
07, 2007 4:27 AM
To: Turbine-User
Subject: [Fwd: NoSuchMethodException for GroupPeerManager.getNewGroup]

Sorry, sent the last one for an email not on the list.

Hi,

I have followed the instructions here. Using 2.3.1

http://turbine.apache.org/turbine/turbine-2.3.1/services/torque-security

-service.html

To use an extended user class. But I am getting a NoSuchMethodException
on line 656 of GroupPeerManager.java

The method looks like this

    public static Group getNewGroup(Persistent p)
    {
        Group g = null;
        try
        {
            Class groupWrapperClass = TurbineSecurity.getGroupClass();

            Class [] clazz = new Class [] { Persistent.class };
            Object [] params = new Object [] { p };

            g = (Group) groupWrapperClass
                .getConstructor(clazz)
                .newInstance(params);
        }
        catch (Exception e)
        {
            log.error("Could not instantiate a new group from supplied
persistent: ", e);
        }

        return g;
    }

Reading the instructions on torque-security-service.html page it says

Group     Implementation
org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.TorqueGroup
Peer     org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineGroupPeer

Persistent object
org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineGroup



I am only using my own TurbineUser substitute, not any of the other
security classes, so I expect from this
" Turbine uses the following configuration for accessing the Torque
schema. If you just want to use the default Peers, you don't need any of


the following configuration, these are the defaults:" That it will use
the default stated above, so I am surprised to see it using "class
org.apache.turbine.om.security.TurbineGroup"

But the class being used is in fact sub class of BaseObject and
therefore does have an empty  constructor, so I cannot work out why it
is throwing this exception anyway?

here are the relevant sections of my TurbineResources.properties

services.SecurityService.classname =
org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.TorqueSecurityService
...
# This is the Peer class used to access the user peer
(org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineUserPeer)
services.SecurityService.user.manager =
org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.TorqueUserManager
services.SecurityService.torque.userPeer.class =
com.stpenable.se.om.ExtendedUserPeer
services.SecurityService.user.class =
com.stpenable.se.security.ExtendedUserImpl
database.maps.builder =
com.stpenable.se.util.db.map.TurbineMapBuilderAdapter
# This is the class that implements the ACL interface.
services.SecurityService.acl.class =
org.apache.turbine.util.security.TurbineAccessControlList


Is there some configuration the article does not mention?

thanks

David


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@...


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@...


 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@...

 

--
David Wynter
Director
STPenable Ltd.
[phone] Office
[phone] Reception
[phone] Mobile
mailto:david@...
www.stpenable.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------- To
unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@... For additional
commands, e-mail: user-help@...

[Peter Courcoux-2]

Hi David,

It looks like it is tagged in subversion, or am I missing something?

Regards,

Peter


David Wynter wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I thought I'd better get the Turbine source for V2.3.1 to see what is
> going on fully for my problem. No mirrors have it or any version for
> that matter, marc as stopped archiving the Turbine lists. Seems since
> going to a full project things have gone backwards. The apache list
> archives link is broken. What a mess!
>
> David
>
> David Wynter wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I do not follow you? Nowhere do I specify anything to do with
>> changing the Group from the std default class. This is the standard
>> framework behaving like this. The only changes I have made are to do
>> with replacing TurbineUser with my own extended class. How many
>> people have attempted to extend from TurbineUser based on those
>> instructions?
>>
>> I now understand a little more. I cannot work out how this ever
>> worked to tell you the truth. This reflection work here
>>
>>            g = (Group) groupWrapperClass
>>                .getConstructor(clazz)
>>                .newInstance(params);
>>
>> Is expecting to find a constructor that takes this
>>
>> Class [] clazz = new Class [] { Persistent.class };
>>
>> as a argument, and the class Turbine Security service is using,
>> "org.apache.turbine.om.security.TurbineGroup"
>> simply does not have that constructor. But then again neither does
>> the class the documentation tells me it should be using,
>> "org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineGroup" have
>> that constructor, so how can this ever work? Am I misinterpreting the
>> constructor signature required?
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>>
>> Tony Oslund wrote:
>>> Just a thought....
>>>
>>> Instead of specifying just Group, try explicitly specifying the full
>>> path to Group.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: David Wynter [mailto:david@...] Sent: Tuesday,
>>> August 07, 2007 4:27 AM
>>> To: Turbine-User
>>> Subject: [Fwd: NoSuchMethodException for GroupPeerManager.getNewGroup]
>>>
>>> Sorry, sent the last one for an email not on the list.
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have followed the instructions here. Using 2.3.1
>>>
>>> http://turbine.apache.org/turbine/turbine-2.3.1/services/torque-security 
>>>
>>> -service.html
>>>
>>> To use an extended user class. But I am getting a
>>> NoSuchMethodException on line 656 of GroupPeerManager.java
>>>
>>> The method looks like this
>>>
>>>     public static Group getNewGroup(Persistent p)
>>>     {
>>>         Group g = null;
>>>         try
>>>         {
>>>             Class groupWrapperClass = TurbineSecurity.getGroupClass();
>>>
>>>             Class [] clazz = new Class [] { Persistent.class };
>>>             Object [] params = new Object [] { p };
>>>
>>>             g = (Group) groupWrapperClass
>>>                 .getConstructor(clazz)
>>>                 .newInstance(params);
>>>         }
>>>         catch (Exception e)
>>>         {
>>>             log.error("Could not instantiate a new group from
>>> supplied persistent: ", e);
>>>         }
>>>
>>>         return g;
>>>     }
>>>
>>> Reading the instructions on torque-security-service.html page it says
>>>
>>> Group     Implementation
>>> org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.TorqueGroup
>>> Peer    
>>> org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineGroupPeer
>>> Persistent object
>>> org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineGroup
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am only using my own TurbineUser substitute, not any of the other
>>> security classes, so I expect from this
>>> " Turbine uses the following configuration for accessing the Torque
>>> schema. If you just want to use the default Peers, you don't need
>>> any of
>>>
>>> the following configuration, these are the defaults:" That it will
>>> use the default stated above, so I am surprised to see it using
>>> "class org.apache.turbine.om.security.TurbineGroup"
>>>
>>> But the class being used is in fact sub class of BaseObject and
>>> therefore does have an empty  constructor, so I cannot work out why
>>> it is throwing this exception anyway?
>>>
>>> here are the relevant sections of my TurbineResources.properties
>>>
>>> services.SecurityService.classname =
>>> org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.TorqueSecurityService
>>> ...
>>> # This is the Peer class used to access the user peer
>>> (org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineUserPeer)
>>> services.SecurityService.user.manager =
>>> org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.TorqueUserManager
>>> services.SecurityService.torque.userPeer.class =
>>> com.stpenable.se.om.ExtendedUserPeer
>>> services.SecurityService.user.class =
>>> com.stpenable.se.security.ExtendedUserImpl
>>> database.maps.builder =
>>> com.stpenable.se.util.db.map.TurbineMapBuilderAdapter
>>> # This is the class that implements the ACL interface.
>>> services.SecurityService.acl.class =
>>> org.apache.turbine.util.security.TurbineAccessControlList
>>>
>>>
>>> Is there some configuration the article does not mention?
>>>
>>> thanks
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@...
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@...
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@...
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@...
>>>
>>>
>>>  
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@...
>> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@...
>>
>
> --
> _David Wynter _
> *Director *
> STPenable Ltd.
> [phone] Office
> [phone] Reception
> [phone] Mobile
> mailto:david@...
> www.stpenable.com
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@... For
> additional commands, e-mail: user-help@...

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@...

[seade]

David Wynter wrote:
> I thought I'd better get the Turbine source for V2.3.1 to see what is
> going on fully for my problem. No mirrors have it or any version for
> that matter,
The downloads are still sitting under jakarta at present, though only
the latest release (2.3.2) is to be found there.  For older releases try
the archive site (also under jakarta):
http://archive.apache.org/dist/jakarta/turbine/  Subversion tags are
also intact.
> marc as stopped archiving the Turbine lists.
The person who maintains marc was informed about the mailing list
changes, but it seems did not make the necessary changes to continue
archiving the turbine lists (Nabble and Gmane were also notified).
> Seems since going to a full project things have gone backwards.
And yet still we respond.
> The apache list archives link is broken.
The Turbine site includes links to the archives:
http://turbine.apache.org/contact.html - links included in the
documentation of older releases will not work, it is simply not
practical to go back and redo the documentation for all previous releases.
> What a mess!
Thanks David - the effort you put into helping with the migration was
appreciated.

Scott (very busy - boo hoo)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@...

[Tony Oslund-2]

Were you interested in the 2.3.1 source?

-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Oslund [mailto:tonyo@...]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 11:01 AM
To: Turbine Users List; david@...
Subject: RE: [Fwd: NoSuchMethodException for
GroupPeerManager.getNewGroup]

I had downloaded some of the v2.3.1 source a couple of years back.  For
whatever reason I still have it.

 

I have both zip and tar.  Should I send it to email listed here?

 

________________________________

From: David Wynter [mailto:david@...]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 10:53 AM
To: Turbine Users List
Subject: Re: [Fwd: NoSuchMethodException for
GroupPeerManager.getNewGroup]

 

Hi,

I thought I'd better get the Turbine source for V2.3.1 to see what is
going on fully for my problem. No mirrors have it or any version for
that matter, marc as stopped archiving the Turbine lists. Seems since
going to a full project things have gone backwards. The apache list
archives link is broken. What a mess!

David

David Wynter wrote:

Hi,

I do not follow you? Nowhere do I specify anything to do with changing
the Group from the std default class. This is the standard framework
behaving like this. The only changes I have made are to do with
replacing TurbineUser with my own extended class. How many people have
attempted to extend from TurbineUser based on those instructions?

I now understand a little more. I cannot work out how this ever worked
to tell you the truth. This reflection work here

           g = (Group) groupWrapperClass
               .getConstructor(clazz)
               .newInstance(params);

Is expecting to find a constructor that takes this

Class [] clazz = new Class [] { Persistent.class };

as a argument, and the class Turbine Security service is using,
"org.apache.turbine.om.security.TurbineGroup"
simply does not have that constructor. But then again neither does the
class the documentation tells me it should be using,
"org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineGroup" have that
constructor, so how can this ever work? Am I misinterpreting the
constructor signature required?

David



Tony Oslund wrote:



Just a thought....

Instead of specifying just Group, try explicitly specifying the full
path to Group.

-----Original Message-----
From: David Wynter [mailto:david@...] Sent: Tuesday, August
07, 2007 4:27 AM
To: Turbine-User
Subject: [Fwd: NoSuchMethodException for GroupPeerManager.getNewGroup]

Sorry, sent the last one for an email not on the list.

Hi,

I have followed the instructions here. Using 2.3.1

http://turbine.apache.org/turbine/turbine-2.3.1/services/torque-security

-service.html

To use an extended user class. But I am getting a NoSuchMethodException
on line 656 of GroupPeerManager.java

The method looks like this

    public static Group getNewGroup(Persistent p)
    {
        Group g = null;
        try
        {
            Class groupWrapperClass = TurbineSecurity.getGroupClass();

            Class [] clazz = new Class [] { Persistent.class };
            Object [] params = new Object [] { p };

            g = (Group) groupWrapperClass
                .getConstructor(clazz)
                .newInstance(params);
        }
        catch (Exception e)
        {
            log.error("Could not instantiate a new group from supplied
persistent: ", e);
        }

        return g;
    }

Reading the instructions on torque-security-service.html page it says

Group     Implementation
org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.TorqueGroup
Peer     org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineGroupPeer

Persistent object
org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineGroup



I am only using my own TurbineUser substitute, not any of the other
security classes, so I expect from this
" Turbine uses the following configuration for accessing the Torque
schema. If you just want to use the default Peers, you don't need any of


the following configuration, these are the defaults:" That it will use
the default stated above, so I am surprised to see it using "class
org.apache.turbine.om.security.TurbineGroup"

But the class being used is in fact sub class of BaseObject and
therefore does have an empty  constructor, so I cannot work out why it
is throwing this exception anyway?

here are the relevant sections of my TurbineResources.properties

services.SecurityService.classname =
org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.TorqueSecurityService
...
# This is the Peer class used to access the user peer
(org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineUserPeer)
services.SecurityService.user.manager =
org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.TorqueUserManager
services.SecurityService.torque.userPeer.class =
com.stpenable.se.om.ExtendedUserPeer
services.SecurityService.user.class =
com.stpenable.se.security.ExtendedUserImpl
database.maps.builder =
com.stpenable.se.util.db.map.TurbineMapBuilderAdapter
# This is the class that implements the ACL interface.
services.SecurityService.acl.class =
org.apache.turbine.util.security.TurbineAccessControlList


Is there some configuration the article does not mention?

thanks

David


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@...


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@...


 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@...

 

--
David Wynter
Director
STPenable Ltd.
[phone] Office
[phone] Reception
[phone] Mobile
mailto:david@...
www.stpenable.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------- To
unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@... For additional
commands, e-mail: user-help@...

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@...