[Attn: Jeanfrancois] glassfish-api version has been changed from 10.0.3 to 10.0.400
|
View:
New views
9 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
[Attn: Jeanfrancois] glassfish-api version has been changed from 10.0.3 to 10.0.400
by Sahoo
::
Rate this Message:
Jeanfrancois,
I am curious to know why you changed [1] the version in glassfish-api from 10.0.3 to 10.0.400 skipping so many intermediate numbers. Thanks, Sahoo [1] http://fisheye4.atlassian.com/browse/~br=trunk/glassfish-svn/trunk/v3/common/glassfish-api/pom.xml?r1=21371&r2=21377 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [Attn: Jeanfrancois] glassfish-api version has been changed from 10.0.3 to 10.0.400
by Jerome Dochez
::
Rate this Message:
I asked him to do that, we should now use 400, 401, 402 and so on...
so we don't inflate the glassfish-api version number too fast. jerome On Jul 23, 2008, at 10:34 PM, Sahoo wrote: > Jeanfrancois, > > I am curious to know why you changed [1] the version in glassfish- > api from 10.0.3 to 10.0.400 skipping so many intermediate numbers. > > Thanks, > Sahoo > > [1] http://fisheye4.atlassian.com/browse/~br=trunk/glassfish-svn/ > trunk/v3/common/glassfish-api/pom.xml?r1=21371&r2=21377 > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [Attn: Jeanfrancois] glassfish-api version has been changed from 10.0.3 to 10.0.400
by Sahoo
::
Rate this Message:
I understand we have to now use 401, 402,..., but why did we jump to 400
from 3? Thanks, Sahoo Jerome Dochez wrote: > I asked him to do that, we should now use 400, 401, 402 and so on... > so we don't inflate the glassfish-api version number too fast. > > jerome > > On Jul 23, 2008, at 10:34 PM, Sahoo wrote: > >> Jeanfrancois, >> >> I am curious to know why you changed [1] the version in glassfish-api >> from 10.0.3 to 10.0.400 skipping so many intermediate numbers. >> >> Thanks, >> Sahoo >> >> [1] >> http://fisheye4.atlassian.com/browse/~br=trunk/glassfish-svn/trunk/v3/common/glassfish-api/pom.xml?r1=21371&r2=21377 >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [Attn: Jeanfrancois] glassfish-api version has been changed from 10.0.3 to 10.0.400
by Jerome Dochez
::
Rate this Message:
I did not want to confuse folks about 3 and 100, maybe that was not
such a good idea. Anyhow I don't think it matters terribly if we switch back to snapshots at some point. now there is a more important subject I would like to discuss : which version should we use for prelude, thereafter during development and finally for Java EE 6 release. should we have something like : dev now : 10.0-SNAPSHOT milestones build : ? prelude : 10.1.x [x starts at 0 and is incremented as we deliver fixes to prelude] dev after prelude : 10.1.99-SNAPSHOT Java EE 6 release : 10.2.0 this of course does not have to be in sync with our product version but should be if possible. Also do we include the version in the jar file name we deliver ? I we do keep the version, we will most likely have several versions of the same jar in a particular installation, can we ensure that felix will always resolve to the latest one when import package with open range is specified. jerome On Jul 24, 2008, at 12:03 AM, Sahoo wrote: > I understand we have to now use 401, 402,..., but why did we jump to > 400 from 3? > > Thanks, > Sahoo > > Jerome Dochez wrote: >> I asked him to do that, we should now use 400, 401, 402 and so >> on... so we don't inflate the glassfish-api version number too fast. >> >> jerome >> >> On Jul 23, 2008, at 10:34 PM, Sahoo wrote: >> >>> Jeanfrancois, >>> >>> I am curious to know why you changed [1] the version in glassfish- >>> api from 10.0.3 to 10.0.400 skipping so many intermediate numbers. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Sahoo >>> >>> [1] http://fisheye4.atlassian.com/browse/~br=trunk/glassfish-svn/ >>> trunk/v3/common/glassfish-api/pom.xml?r1=21371&r2=21377 >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [Attn: Jeanfrancois] glassfish-api version has been changed from 10.0.3 to 10.0.400
by Sahoo
::
Rate this Message:
Jerome Dochez wrote:
> I did not want to confuse folks about 3 and 100, maybe that was not > such a good idea. Anyhow I don't think it matters terribly if we > switch back to snapshots at some point. > now there is a more important subject I would like to discuss : which > version For which artifact? glassfish-api or for all artifacts built as part of v3. If you are asking for all artifacts, then this is what I was thinking a few days back: For all artifacts built out of v3, we would use 10.0.0 for prelude, 10.0.x for any patch/UR on top of prelude, 10.1.0 for release following prelude, and 10.2.0 for the next next. Obviously, this won't work any more, because we have already changed glassfish-api to use 10.0.1 :-( . For all promoted builds and milestones, we can use qualifier. Thanks, Sahoo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [Attn: Jeanfrancois] glassfish-api version has been changed from 10.0.3 to 10.0.400
by Jerome Dochez
::
Rate this Message:
On Jul 24, 2008, at 12:34 AM, Sahoo wrote: > Jerome Dochez wrote: >> I did not want to confuse folks about 3 and 100, maybe that was not >> such a good idea. Anyhow I don't think it matters terribly if we >> switch back to snapshots at some point. >> now there is a more important subject I would like to discuss : >> which version > For which artifact? glassfish-api or for all artifacts built as part > of v3. If you are asking for all artifacts, then this is what I was > thinking a few days back: > For all artifacts built out of v3, we would use 10.0.0 for prelude, "after" 10.0-SNAPSHOT ? > 10.0.x for any patch/UR on top of prelude, yes so that follows what I was suggesting assuming we don't have to use 10.1.0 for prelude. > 10.1.0 for release following prelude, and 10.2.0 for the next next. > Obviously, this won't work any more, because we have already changed > glassfish-api to use 10.0.1 :-( . yes but that's ok, not all the modules have to have the same version for all of them. we will have to do something special for glassfish- api for prelude, after it will fall back on the same scheme as the others. > > > For all promoted builds and milestones, we can use qualifier. > > Thanks, > Sahoo > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [Attn: Jeanfrancois] glassfish-api version has been changed from 10.0.3 to 10.0.400
by Stephen Connolly-2
::
Rate this Message:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:39 AM, Jerome Dochez <Jerome.Dochez@...> wrote:
http://maven.apache.org/ref/current/maven-artifact/xref/org/apache/maven/artifact/versioning/DefaultArtifactVersion.html#50 1 == 1.0 == 1.0.0 So 10.0.0 is after 10-SNAPSHOT, 10.0-SNAPSHOT and 10.0.0-SNAPSHOT as a build with a qualifier is always before a build with a qualifier
|
|
|
Re: [Attn: Jeanfrancois] glassfish-api version has been changed from 10.0.3 to 10.0.400
by Sahoo
::
Rate this Message:
Stephen Connolly wrote: > > So 10.0.0 is after 10-SNAPSHOT, 10.0-SNAPSHOT and 10.0.0-SNAPSHOT as a > build with a qualifier is always before a build with a qualifier Did you want to say: a build with a qualifier is always before a build *without* a qualifier? Thanks, Sahoo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [Attn: Jeanfrancois] glassfish-api version has been changed from 10.0.3 to 10.0.400
by Stephen Connolly-2
::
Rate this Message:
yes
Sent from my iPod On 24 Jul 2008, at 17:55, Sahoo <sahoo@...> wrote: > > Stephen Connolly wrote: >> >> So 10.0.0 is after 10-SNAPSHOT, 10.0-SNAPSHOT and 10.0.0-SNAPSHOT >> as a build with a qualifier is always before a build with a qualifier > Did you want to say: > a build with a qualifier is always before a build *without* a > qualifier? > > Thanks, > Sahoo > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
| Free Forum Powered by Nabble | Forum Help |