[65cat] [news] NetCAT Status Report - 1.

[nvarun]

2008/7/25 Anuradha G <theanuradha@...>:

Opes may be I don't have 81 :-)

My position under scanner, is it? 83 to ? Lets wait and watch. Relax for a while, Jirka!

--
Varun

[sunbiz_3000]

Yes... I need to start sending more emails to the list now... 

There comes my 1 point!!

--
Regards,
Saptarshi PURKAYASTHA
My Tech Blog: http://sunnytalkstech.blogspot.com
You Live by CHOICE, Not by CHANCE

2008/7/25 Anuradha G <theanuradha@...>:

Opes may be I don't have 81 :-)

2008/7/25 Jiri Kovalsky <Jiri.Kovalsky@...>:

Oh, I am really tired today. The points do not reflect the table I was referring to. I am sooo sorry for this. :-(

I will update it tonight.

Please stay tuned!
-Jirka

Jiri Kovalsky wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
>    the CAT points reflect everybody's activity in terms of sent e-mails, submitted bugs/RFEs, tutorial reviews, participation in surveys and other extra contributions. Please look at the FAQ #8 [1] to find out how valuable each type of activity is. Let me point out that in order to get points for bug/RFEs submissions these must have [65cat] prefix in their descriptions and must be reported by your netbeans.org username after July 14th.
>
> [1] http://qa.netbeans.org/processes/cat/65/faqs.html#8
>
>    And before somebody asks I forgot to add 5 points to all of you who participated in the NB Certification Exam review. :-( I apologize for this and will fix it next time - week of August 11th.
>
> Hope this helps,
> -Jirka
>
> 文生 郭 wrote:
>> Cool, thank you for the time spend to do the count and update the page.
>>
>> Can you remind us how these points are counted please?
>> (if I don't ask, others will ask anyway :-) )
>>
>> Vincent

--
Anuradha G

[HandyGeek]

Hi Jiri,
Should I put [65cat] in issues that I opened before netcat65, and am
still now actively working?
Best! David

Jiri Kovalsky wrote:

> Hello Sheri and Michael,
>
> your wish is granted! The CAT points are calculated as of July 25th,
> 2008 3:00 p.m. CET.
>
> Hope this helps,
> -Jirka
>
> Sheri Lilly wrote:
>
>

[Anuradha G]

AFAIK you can put [65cat]if you feel that issue need highlighted but you do not earn any points for those

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 9:21 PM, HandyGeek <thompsonwd40@...> wrote:

Hi Jiri,
Should I put [65cat] in issues that I opened before netcat65, and am still now actively working?
Best! David

Jiri Kovalsky wrote:

Hello Sheri and Michael,

your wish is granted! The CAT points are calculated as of July 25th, 2008 3:00 p.m. CET.

Hope this helps,
-Jirka

Sheri Lilly wrote:

--
Anuradha G

[Jiri Kovalsky]

That's right. You can put the [65cat] prefix to old issues but you get no points for it if you are not its reporter or the issue was reported before July 14th.

-Jirka

Anuradha G wrote:

> AFAIK you can put [65cat]if you feel that issue need highlighted but you
> do not earn any points for those
>
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 9:21 PM, HandyGeek wrote:
>
>> Hi Jiri,
>> Should I put [65cat] in issues that I opened before netcat65, and am
>> still now actively working?
>> Best! David

[Jiri Kovalsky]

Please don't send plain messages just to earn more points as it can discourage other NetCAT participants to stay active and provide us with their findings. The point contest is just for fun + to see who is rather passive and should be replaced.

Thanks for your understanding,
-Jirka

Saptarshi Purkayastha wrote:

> Yes... I need to start sending more emails to the list now...
>
> There comes my 1 point!!
>
> --
> Regards,
> Saptarshi PURKAYASTHA
> My Tech Blog: http://sunnytalkstech.blogspot.com
> You Live by CHOICE, Not by CHANCE

[Anuradha G]

Hey guy http://qa.netbeans.org/processes/cat/65/participants.html got updated and I got 139 not bad at all

2008/7/25 Jiri Kovalsky <Jiri.Kovalsky@...>:

Oh, I am really tired today. The points do not reflect the table I was referring to. I am sooo sorry for this. :-(

I will update it tonight.

Please stay tuned!
-Jirka

Jiri Kovalsky wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
>    the CAT points reflect everybody's activity in terms of sent e-mails, submitted bugs/RFEs, tutorial reviews, participation in surveys and other extra contributions. Please look at the FAQ #8 [1] to find out how valuable each type of activity is. Let me point out that in order to get points for bug/RFEs submissions these must have [65cat] prefix in their descriptions and must be reported by your netbeans.org username after July 14th.
>
> [1] http://qa.netbeans.org/processes/cat/65/faqs.html#8
>
>    And before somebody asks I forgot to add 5 points to all of you who participated in the NB Certification Exam review. :-( I apologize for this and will fix it next time - week of August 11th.
>
> Hope this helps,
> -Jirka
>
> 文生 郭 wrote:
>> Cool, thank you for the time spend to do the count and update the page.
>>
>> Can you remind us how these points are counted please?
>> (if I don't ask, others will ask anyway :-) )
>>
>> Vincent

--
Anuradha G

[nvarun]

2008/7/26 Anuradha G <theanuradha@...>

Hey guy http://qa.netbeans.org/processes/cat/65/participants.html got updated and I got 139 not bad at all

Cool! Lol, I am no longer the top scorer. Short-lived fame :-P

--
Varun

[Sheri Lilly]

This is wonderful, thanks Jirka

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Jiri Kovalsky <Jiri.Kovalsky@...> wrote:

Hello Sheri and Michael,

your wish is granted! The CAT points are calculated as of July 25th, 2008 3:00 p.m. CET.

Hope this helps,
-Jirka

Sheri Lilly wrote:

Like Michael, I would like to see this page updated.  http://qa.netbeans.org/processes/cat/65/participants.html
 Sheri

On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Michael Nascimento wrote:

I wish this page:

http://qa.netbeans.org/processes/cat/65/participants.html

had been updated with the current NetCAT points count per participant.
This would help understanding how many people will be replaced if we
keep the same pace per week.